Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 13;8(14):e012364. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012364

Table 5.

Estimates of PRs From Polytomous Logistic Regression for the Population Without Cardiovascular Disease When Inadequate CVH and Average CVH Were Compared With the Population With Optimum CVH, Adults Aged ≥20, NHANES 2007–2014

Inadequate CVHcPR (95% CI) Average CVHcPR (95% CI)
Self‐reported family history
Nob
Yes 1.98 (1.40–2.79) 1.59 (1.31–1.92)
Age, y
20–39b
40–59 6.13 (4.58–8.21) 2.67 (2.31–3.08)
≥60 8.58 (6.56–11.22) 4.25 (3.61–5.01)
Sex
Femaleb
Male 1.26 (0.99–1.62) 1.29 (1.15–1.44)
Race/Ethnicity
Non‐Hispanic whiteb
Hispanic 1.04 (0.74–1.46) 1.10 (0.91–1.33)
Non‐Hispanic black 2.38 (1.82–3.12) 1.78 (1.49–2.13)
Othera 0.81 (0.48–1.36) 0.70 (0.59–0.85)
Income‐to‐poverty ratiod
 ≥1b
<1 1.98 (1.42–2.76) 1.27 (1.02–1.59)
Education
High school completion or greaterb
Less than high school completion 3.19 (2.42–4.20) 2.00 (1.77–2.27)

CVH indicates cardiovascular health; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PR, prevalence ratio.

a

Non‐Hispanic Asians, non‐Hispanic multiracial, and non‐Hispanic other race.

b

Reference group.

c

A score of 0, 1, or 2 was assigned to each cardiovascular health metric to represent poor, intermediate, or ideal health. On the basis of the sum of scores for all 7 cardiovascular metrics, an overall score, ranging from 0 to 14, was categorized as inadequate (0–4), average (5–9), or optimum (10–14) cardiovascular health.

d

A ratio of family income to poverty guidelines.