Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2017 Sep 7;27(3):622–628. doi: 10.1002/hec.3588

Table 1:

Summary statistics among female recipients of the Child Grant Program by administration of list randomization

Panel A: All women (15–49 years)
(1) (2) (3)
Full sample Violence set Control set
mean mean mean
List randomization (# items reported) 1.906 1.978*** 1.832
Age (years, baseline) 28.18 28.01 28.36
Highest grade attained (baseline) 4.019 3.950 4.089
Divorced/separated/widowed (baseline) 0.143 0.135 0.152
Married/cohabiting (baseline) 0.742 0.746 0.738
Log household size (baseline) 1.846 1.842 1.850
Shang’ombo district 0.345 0.344 0.347
Kaputa district 0.316 0.318 0.313
Kalabo district 0.339 0.338 0.340
N 2,171 1,096 1,075
Panel B: Married or co-habiting women (15–49 years)
(1) (2) (3)
Full sample Violence set Control set
mean mean mean
List randomization (# items reported) 1.885 1.959** 1.809
Age (years, baseline) 28.16 27.88 28.44
Highest grade attained (baseline) 3.932 3.957 3.906
Divorced/separated/widowed (baseline) 0.0489 0.0414 0.0565
Married/cohabiting (baseline) 0.906 0.910 0.902
Log household size (baseline) 1.877 1.864* 1.890
Shang’ombo district 0.363 0.367 0.359
Kaputa district 0.354 0.350 0.358
Kalabo district 0.283 0.284 0.283
N 1,617 821 796

Notes: Bivariate t-tests were run to test for differences in covariates at baseline between women asked the violence set (5-item group) and control question set (4-item group);

***

p<0.01;

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.10