Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Psychol. 2019 Jan 28;64(2):229–236. doi: 10.1037/rep0000260

Table 10.

ANOVA Comparisons of GCS by Group

Group n M SD 95% CI
 Tukey’s HSD Comparisons
[LL, UL] 1 2 3 4
1. White low VGM 19 11.32 2.90 [9.91, 12.72] — .409 .308 .334
2. White high VGM 10 13.50 2.50 [11.71, 15.29] 2.18 — .013 .017
3. POC low VGM 46 9.61 3.84 [8.47, 10.75] −1.70 −3.89 — 1.00
4. POC high VGM 30 9.53 3.85 [8.09, 10.97] −1.78 −3.96 .84 —

Note. Mean differences are provided in the lower portion of Tukey’s HSD comparisons; p values are provided in upper portion of the same columns. CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit; VGM = vulnerable group membership; POC = people of color or minority race status; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale.