Table 5. Weight of evidence assessments for physiological outcomes.
Study ID | Weight of Evidence A: Quality | Weight of Evidence B: Research design | Weight of Evidence C: Relevance | Weight of Evidence D: Overall weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
Correlational studies | ||||
Lin 2013 [82] | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Intervention studies | ||||
Barker 2003 [53] | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
DeSchriver 1990 [84] | Low | High | High | High |
Edwards 2002 [64] | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Edwards 2013 [65] | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Katcher 1984 [85] | Low | High | High | High |
Maranda 2015 [86] | Medium | High | High | High |
Riddick 1985 [60] | Low | Low | High | Low |
Sanchez 2015 [63] | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Wells 2005 [68] | Medium | High | High | High |
Public aquariums | ||||
Cracknell 2016 [87] | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Sahrmann 2016 [88] | Low | Medium | High | Medium |