Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar 28;66:24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.003

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review (N=77)

# Study Location N Sample Descriptor [Age range] Mean Age,
SD
% racial
or ethnic
minorities
Cross-Sectional
v. longitudinal v.
RCT
Approach

Adult Sample Populations
ICD Code for Gender Dysphoria
(1) Blosnich et al. (2013) U.S.-wide 1326 Veterans with ICD Code for gender identity disorder (FY00-FY11) n.r.b n.r. Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(2) Blosnich et al. (2014) U.S.-wide 5117 Veterans with ICD Codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or transvestic fetishism (FY98-FY13) n.r.b n.r. Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(3) Blosnich et al. (2016) U.S.-wide 1640 Veterans with ICD Codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or transvestic fetishism with 1 past-year medical visit (FY13) [n.r.] 54.8, 13.2 18.8 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(4) Brown & Jones (2014)* U.S.-wide 5135 Veterans with ICD Code for gender identity disorder (FY96-FY13) White TG: [n.r.] 56.7,13.2 Black TG: [n.r.] 51.2,13.9 7.5 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(5) Brown & Jones (2015) U.S.-wide 4793 Veterans with ICD Codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or transvestic fetishism (FY00-FY13) [n.r.] 55.5, 13.5 19.4 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(6) Brown & Jones (2016)* U.S.-wide 5135 Veterans with ICD Codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or transvestic fetishism (FY96-FY13) [n.r.] 55.8, 13.5 19.8 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(7) Lindsay et al. (2016) U.S.-wide 332 Veterans who served in Afghanistan with ICD Codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, transsexualism with asexual history; transsexual with homosexual history; transsexual with heterosexual history (FY00-FY13) [n.r.] 33.9, 8 27.5 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(8) Reisner et al. (2014) Boston, MA 23 Transmen who tested positive for sexually transmitted infection [n.r.] 32, 7.3 52.2 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
Presenting for Services
(9) Keo-Meier et al. (2015) Houston, TX 43 Transmen presenting for hormone treatment [n.r.] 26.6, 8.4 26 Prospective Survey pre-post treatment
(10) Leinung et al. (2013) Albany, NY 242(n = 192 TW, 50 TM) Transgender clients who received hormone treatments [n.r.] 36.3, 12.3 TW: [n.r.] 38, 12.5 TM: [n.r.] 29.9, 9.9 n.r. Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(11) Nemoto et al. (2005) San Francisco, CA 109 Transwomen who participated in a workshop series (health, mental health, substance use, connection to services) hosted by community organization n.r.b n.r. Prospective Survey pre-post treatment
Presenting for Services; Self-Identified
(12) Cole et al. (1997) n.r. 435 Transgender clients who presented for gender-related services TW: [n.r.] 32, 9TM: [n.r.] 30, 8 n.r. Cross-Sectional Chart review
Self-Identified
(13) Ainsworth & Spiegel (2010) U.S.-wide 247 Transwomen who received facial feminization or genital surgeries [n.r.] 49, n.r. n.r. Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(14) Barr et al. (2016) U.S.-wide 571 Transgender or gender non-conforming [18–86] 31.0, 13 20 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(15) Bazargan & Galvan (2012) Los Angeles, CA 220 Latina Transwomen [18+] n.r.a 100 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(16) Benotsch et al. (2013) Mid-Atlantic Richmond, VA & Washington DC areas 155 Transgender individuals recruited at transgender health clinics or community venues [n.r.] 31.9, 11.6 62.3 Cross-Sectional Survey
(17) Bradford et al. (2013)* VA, 44% cities and towns represented 350 Transgender or gender-non conforming [Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study] [n.r.] 37.2, 12.7 38 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey; Mail-In Survey
(18) Budge et al. (2013) U.S.-wide 351 Transwomen or Transmen, excluding non-binary and cross-dressing [18–78] 40, 13 14 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(19) Clements-Nolle et al. (2001)* San Francisco, CA 515(n = 392 TW, 123 TM) Transgender or gender-nonconforming TW: [18–67], 34, n.r. TM: [19–61], 36, n.r. TW: 73 TM: 33 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(20) Clements-Nolle et al. (2006)* San Francisco, CA 515(n = 392 TW, 123 TM) Transgender or gender-nonconforming TW: [18–67] 34, n.r. TM: [19–61] 37, n.r. TW: 73 TM: 34 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(21) Colton-Meier et al. (2011) U.S.-wide 369 Transmen who self-identified as “female-to-male transsexuals” [18–68] 28, n.r. 23 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(22) Dowshen et al. (2016) 15 U.S. cities 66 Transgender youth living with HIV [18–24] 21.1, 2.2 n.r. Cross-Sectional Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
(23) DuBois (2012) Western MA; Boston, MA; Southern VT 65 Transmen using testosterone [n.r.] 31.8, 9.1 26 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured (Clinical) Interview
(24) Flentje et al. (2014) San Francisco, CA 199(n = 146 TW, 53 TM) Transgender clients accessing substance abuse treatment [n.r.] 38.3, 13.5 TW: 62.3 TM: 45.3 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(25) Flentje et al. (2016) San Francisco, CA 49 Transgender individuals who were homeless n.r.b TW: 76 TM: 44 Cross-Sectional Survey
(26) Fredriksen-Goldsen et al. (2013)* U.S.-wide 174 Transgender sub-sample from survey of LGBT older adults (50+) [Aging with Pride Project] [n.r.] 61, 9 21 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey; Mail-In Survey
(27) Gameral et al. (2014) San Francisco, CA 191 Couples; Transwomen with cisgender male partners [n.r.] 36, 11 79 Cross-Sectional Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
(28) Glynn et al. (2016) San Francisco, CA 573 Transwomen with histories of sex work [n.r.] 35.1, 9.4 79 Cross-Sectional Survey
(29) Goldblum et al. (2012)* VA (statewide) 290 Transgender or gender-nonconforming [Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study] [18–65] 37, 13 34 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey; Mail-In Survey
(30) Horvath et al. (2014) U.S.-wide, split rural non-rural 1229 Transgender people living in rural and non-rural communities TW: [n.r.] 38, n.r.TM: [n.r.] 26.2, n.r. 18.5 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(31) Hoy-Ellis et al. (2017)* U.S.-wide 183 Transgender sub-sample from survey of LGBT older adults (50+) [Aging with Pride Project] [n.r.] 60.1, n.r. 32 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(32) Jefferson et al. (2013) San Francisco, CA 98 Transwomen of color [n.r.] 45, 9.8 100 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(33) Kattari et al. (2016) CO (statewide) 417 Transgender or gender-nonconforming[Colorado Transgender Health Survey-2014] [n.r.] 38, n.r. 16 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey; Mail-In Survey
(34) Katz-Wise et al. (2017)* MA 452 Transgender or gender-nonconforming [Project VOICE] [n.r.] 33, 13 21 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey; Mail-In Survey
(35) Keuroughlian et al. (2015)* MA 452 Transgender or gender-nonconforming [Project VOICE] [n.r.] 33.6, 12.8 20.6 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(36) Lehavot et al. (2016) U.S.-wide 212(n = 186 TW, 26 TM) Veterans who self-identified as transgender [n.r.] 49.9, 14.9 10.4 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(37) Maguen et al. (2010) Boston, MA 153(n = 125 TW, 28 TM) Transgender or gender non-conforming conference attendees [2004] [18–75] 47, 11 3(4 TW, 0 TM) Cross-Sectional Self-Report Survey
(38) Mathy (2003) U.S.-wide 73 Transgender sub-sample from online survey [19–58] 37, 10 n.r. Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(39) McDuffie & Brown(2010) Clinic in TN 70 Veterans seeking treatment for gender-related concerns (FY87-FY07) [20–70] n.r.a 14 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(40) Meyer et al.(2017) 19 U.S. states; Guam 691 Transgender sub-sample from a population based surveillance survey n.r.b n.r. Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Phone Interview
(41) Nemoto et al. (2015) San Francisco & Oakland, CA 235 African-American Transwomen with history of sex work [n.r.] 35.1, n.r. 100 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(42) Newfield et al. (2006) San Francisco Bay area, CA 376 Transmen living in the U.S. [n.r.] 32.6, 10.8 11 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(43) Nuttbrock et al. (2010) New York, NY 571 Transwomen (baseline) [19–59] 37, n.r. 73 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(44) Nuttbrock et al. (2014) New York, NY 230 Transwomen (baseline & follow-up) [19–59] 34, n.r. 65 Prospective Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(45) Operario et al. (2011) San Francisco Bay area, CA 174 Transwomen with cisgender male sexual partners [18+] 37.8, 10.7 88 Cross-Sectional Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
(46) Pflum et al. (2015) U.S.; Canada 865(n = 145 M, 106 W, 259 TM, 163 TW, 34 GQ-MaB, 158 GQ-FaB) Transgender or gender-nonconforming M: [n.r.] 31.9,11 W: [n.r.] 39.2, 16.2 TM: [n.r.] 30.9, 11.3 TW: [n.r.] 37.2, 14.9 GQ-MaB: [n.r.] 34.6, 13.9 GQ-FaB: [n.r.] 24.5, 7.1 M: 13.8 W: 11.3 TM: 11.6 TW: 9.2 GQ-MaB: 5.9 GQ-FaB: 13.9 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(47) Reisner et al. (2016a) Boston, MA Two Samples: 12, 17 Transmen with cisgender male sexual partners [18–29] 24.3, 2.8 3.5 Prospective Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview (pre-post)
(48) Reisner et al. (2016b)* MA 452(n = 285 FTM, 167 MTF) Transgender or gender-nonconforming [Project VOICE] [n.r.] 33, 13 21 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(49) Salzar et al. (2017) Atlanta, GA 92 Transwomen with cisgender male sexual partners [n.r.] 34, n.r. 89 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(50) Sanchez & Vilain(2009) AZ, CA 53 Transwomen who attended a transgender conference [21–77] 51, 11.6 14 Cross-Sectional Survey
(51) Shipherd et al. (2010) Boston, MA 130 Transgender or gender non-conforming conference attendees [2008] [22–79] 49.2, 11 8 Cross-Sectional Survey
(52) Shipherd et al. (2011) Boston, MA 97 (n=43 MTD, 54 LTD) Transwomen conference attendees [2005] [20–72] 47.5, 10.8 6–3.1 Cross-Sectional Survey
(53) Shipherd et al. (2012) Boston, MA 141(n=43 veterans) Transwomen conference attendees [2008] [26–79] 51.6, 10.9 3.6 Cross-Sectional Survey
(54) Stanton et al. (2017) U.S.-wide 376(n = 105 TW, 78 TM, 131 TO) Transgender sub-sample from online survey [U.S. Social Justice Sexuality Survey] [18–50+] n.r.a 77 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(55) Warren et al. (2016) U.S.-wide 208(n = 82 TW, 126 TM) Transgender sub-sample from online survey of LGBT adults TW: [18–65] 35, n.r.TM: [18–65] 27, n.r. TW: 24 TM: 22 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(56) White Hughto et al. (2017)* MA 412 Transgender or gender-nonconforming [Project VOICE] [18–75] 33, 13 21 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(57) Wilson et al. (2014) San Francisco, CA 314 Transwomen n.r.b n.r. Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(58) Bockting et al. (2013) U.S.-wide, 57% rural 1093 Transgender and gender-nonconforming, including cross-dressing [n.r.] 33, 12 21 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(59) Yang et al. (2015) San Francisco Bay area, CA 191 Transwomen with cisgender male sexual partners [18 −50+] 38, 12 84 Cross-Sectional Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
Child/Adolescent/Young Adult Sample Populations
ICD Code for Gender Dysphoria
(60) Peterson et al. (2016) Cincinnati, OH 96(n = 54 TM, 31 TW, 15 TO) Transgender adolescents with gender dysphoria who presented to a transgender health clinic [12–22] 17.1, 2.3 n.r. Cross-Sectional Computer-Based Survey (CASI); Chart Review
(61) Spack et al. (2012) Boston, MA area 97 Youth with diagnosis of gender identity disorder (1998–2010) referred to a pediatric clinic, with parental support and letter from mental health provider [4–20] 12.8, 3.4 n.r. Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured (Clinical) Interview
(62) Reisner et al. (2015a)* Boston, MA area 180(n = 105 FTM, 72 MTF) Transgender youth receiving services at community health center [12–29] 19.6, 3 53 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(63) Reisner et al. (2015b)* Boston, MA area 180(n = 105 FTM, 72 MTF) Transgender youth receiving services at community health center [12–29] 19.6, 3 53 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
Presenting for Services
(64) Chen et al. (2016) Indianapolis, IN 38 Pediatric patients that received referral related to gender dysphoria [n.r.] 14.4, 3.2 21.1 Cross-Sectional Chart Review
(65) Simons et al. (2013) Los Angeles, CA 66 Transgender youth presenting for care at a gender clinic [12–24] 19, 3 48 Cross-Sectional Survey; Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
Self-Identified
(66) Brennan et al. (2012) Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA 151 Transwomen living with HIV [15–24] 21, 2.5 95 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(67) Durwood et al. (2017) 23 U.S. states; 1 Canadian province Two samples: 63, 116 Children who identified as a gender differing from their natal sex in everyday life by using pronouns associated with their asserted gender [9–14] 10.8, 1.3 41 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(68) Garofalo et al. (2006) Chicago,` IL 51 Racial and ethnic minority transwomen [16–25] 22, n.r. 100 Cross-Sectional Survey
(69) Le et al. (2016) San Francisco, CA 301 Transwomen [16–24] n.r.a 63 Cross-Sectional Survey
(70) Olson et al. (2015) Los Angeles, CA 96 Transgender or gender-nonconforming, gender dysphoria, desire to receive cross-sex hormones, and naivety to hormone treatment [12–24] 19.2, 2.9 48 Cross-Sectional Survey; Chart Review; Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
(71) Olson et al. (2015) 23 U.S. states; 1 Canadian province 73 Matched Controls; Children who identified as a gender differing from their natal sex in everyday life by using pronouns associated with their asserted gender [3–12] 7.7, 2.2 30 Cross-Sectional Survey; Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(72) Reisner, Biello et al. (2016) Chicago, IL; Boston, MA 298 Sexually active transwomen with cisgender male sexual partners [Project LifeSkills] [16–29] 23, 3.5 74 Cross-Sectional Semi-Structured Face-to-Face Interview
(73) Reisner, Katz-Wise et al. (2016) US-wide 26 Transgender sub-sample from online survey [Growing up Today Study 1] [23–28] 25, n.r. 25 Cross-Sectional Survey
(74) Rowe et al. (2015)* San Francisco, CA area 292 Transwomen, HIV-negative [The SHINE Study] [16–24] 21, 2 63 Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
(75) Russell et al. (2011) San Francisco, CA area 21 Transgender sub-sample of LGBT youth survey [The Family Acceptance Project] [21–25] 22.8, 1.4 53 Cross-Sectional Survey; Computer-Based Survey (CASI)
(76) Sterzing et al. (2017) US-wide 310 Transgender and genderqueer sub-sample of online survey for LGBT youth [14–19] 16.4, 0.03 38 Cross-Sectional Survey; Web-Based Survey
(77) Wilson et al. (2016)* San Francisco, CA area 216 Transwomen, HIV-negative [The SHINE Study] [16–24] n.r.a 66 Cross-Sectional Survey
a

= both mean age and SD not reported

b

= age range, mean age, and SD not reported

*

Studies 4 and 6 were from the same sample; Studies 17 and 29 were from same sample, the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study; Studies 19 and 20 were from same sample; Studies 26 and 31 were from same sample, the Aging with Pride Project; Studies 74 and 77 were from the same sample, The SHINE Study; Studies 34, 35, 56, and 48 were from the same sample, Project VOICE; Studies 62 and 63 were from the same sample.

NOTE: Italicized heading indicate how the TGNC sample was defined.

PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; TG = transgender; TW = transwomen; TM = transmen; TO = other transgender (non-binary/gender-fluid); FTM = female to male; MTF = male to female; GQ = genderqueer; W = women; M = men; MaB = male at birth; FaB = female at birth; MTD = more time dressed as women; LTD = less time dressed as women; AZ = Arizona; CA = California; CO = Colorado; GA = Georgia; IL = Illinois; IN = Indianapolis; MA = Massachusetts; NY = New York; OH = Ohio; TN = Tennessee; TX = Texas; VA = Virginia; VT = Vermont