Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;16(7):491–503. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.03.14

Table 4.

Comparison of sociodemographic data of patient and control groups

Demographical data ExP (N=20) CBT (N=21) SUP (N=20) Controls (N=60) p
Age 32.4±13.1 30.9±10.2 33.0±11.8 37.3±10.7 0.326
Gender (%)
 Female 18 (90.0) 18 (85.7) 17 (85.0) 49 (81.7) 0.839
Marital status (%)
 Married 7 (35.0) 5 (23.8) 9 (45.0) 15 (25.0)
 Single 11 (55.0) 14 (66.7) 10 (50.0) 38 (63.3) 0.703
 Divorced, widow, seperated 2 (10.0) 2 (9.5) 1 (5.0) 7 (11.7)
Education (%)
 Literate 1 (5.0) 1 (4.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.3)
 Elementary 3 (15.0) 3 (14.3) 3 (15.0) 16 (26.7)
 High school 5 (25.0) 4 (19.0) 7 (35.0) 14 (23.3) 0.697
 Associate licence, licence 10 (50.0) 11 (52.4) 8 (40.0) 18 (30.0)
 Post-graduate, doctorate 1 (5.0) 2 (9.5) 2 (10.0) 10 (16.7)

Kruskal-Wallis was used for comparison of numerical data and chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables. Ages of groups are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Other values are expressed as percentiles. N: number of subjects, p: probability value, ExP: existential psychotherapy group, CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy group, SUP: supportive counselling group