Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 29;19:1008. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7335-7

Table 1.

Data collection methods and respondent characteristics

In-depth interviews (IDIs) [n = 25] Participant characteristics Ethnic communities Upazila
Marma (n = 14) Murang (n = 11)
Age in years (mean ± SD) 27 ± 8 29 ± 7 Lama, Naikhongchhari, and Ruma
Monthly household income in BDT (mean ± SD) 4300 ± 550 4600 ± 580
Sex (n)
 Male (n = 16) 9 7
 Female (n = 9) 5 4
Education (n)
 1–5 3 4
 6–10 2 2
 10+ 1 0
 No formal schooling 8 5
Marital status (n)
 Married 9 6
 Unmarried 5 5
Family Type (n)
 Extended 6 3
 Nuclear 8 8
Occupation (n)
 Jhum cultivation 7 3
 Handcrafter 1 2
 Small business 2 1
 Day labor 2 3
 Hunting and gathering 1 1
 Others 1 1
Religious belief (n)
 Buddhism 11 8
 Others 3 3
Key Informant Interview (KII) [n = 11]
3 representatives of implementing NGOs 4 community leaders including, teacher, religious leader, and local govt. representative 4 healthcare providers including govt. and traditional healers Lama, and Ruma
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) [n = 9]
4 including Community members, and NGO field staffs 3 Community members 2 Community members Lama, Naikhongchhari, and Ruma