Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 29;19:1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7318-8

Table 5.

Cox proportional hazards analysis of cancer-specific death and all-causes death for subgroups of CRC patients

Cancer-specific death All-causes death
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Panel A: For CRC patients diagnosed after the introduction of the screening program
Program participation (Ref. group: Participants of the program)
 Non-participants of the program 1.46 (1.12–1.91) 0.006 1.37 (1.05–1.77) 0.019
Gender (Ref. group: Female)
 Male 1.24 (1.06–1.45) 0.008 1.23 (1.05–1.44) 0.01
Age at diagnosis (Ref. group: ≤65 yrs)
  > 65 yrs 1.49 (1.28–1.74) < 0.001 1.49 (1.28–1.73) < 0.001
Sub-region (Ref. group: Rural)
 Urban 0.96 (0.82–1.12) 0.589 0.95 (0.81–1.10) 0.475
Level of treatment hospital (Ref. group: Tertiary)
 Secondary 1.5 (1.12–1.91) < 0.001 1.49 (1.28–1.73) < 0.001
TNM Stage (Ref. group: I + II)
 III + IV 1.75 (1.58–1.94) < 0.001 1.77 (1.60–1.95) < 0.001
Panel B: For CRC patients who participated in the screening program
Screening policy compliance (Ref. group: Compliant to the screening policy)
 Incompliant to the screening policy 2.93 (1.64–5.23) < 0.001 3.29 (1.85–5.84) < 0.001
Gender (Ref. group: Female)
 Male 1.91 (1.13–3.22) 0.015 1.73 (1.06–2.84) 0.029
Age at diagnosis (Ref. group: ≤65 yrs)
  > 65 yrs 1.11 (0.67–1.85) 0.674 1.18 (0.72–1.93) 0.506
Sub-region (Ref. group: Rural)
 Urban 0.91 (0.53–1.56) 0.718 0.86 (0.51–1.46) 0.579
Level of treatment hospital (Ref. group: Tertiary)
 Secondary 1.31 (0.80–2.14) 0.283 1.34 (0.84–2.15) 0.224
TNM Stage (Ref. group: I + II)
 III + IV 8.55 (4.54–16.13) < 0.001 7.55 (4.17–13.55) < 0.001

Notes: Colorectal cancer, CRC; Hazard ratio, HR.