Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 29;19:669. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4276-9

Table 2.

The characteristics of spatial clusters for CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC, CRF08_BC and URFs

HIV-1 genotypes Counties Relative risk Log likelihood ratio p-value Observed cases
Total Heterosexual contact Homosexual contact Intravenous drug injection
CRF01_AE
 Primary Cluster Dali 17.41 18.1 6.4E-07 10 2 (20.0%) 8 (80.0%) 0
 Secondary Cluster Xishan, Jinning, Anning, Hongta, Jiangchuan, Chengjiang 5.36 8.6 7.0E-03 11 4 (36.4%) 7 (63.6%) 0
CRF07_BC
 Primary Cluster Wuhua, Panlong, Xishang, Anning 3.68 8.3 1.4E-02 16 7 (43.8%) 7 (43.8%) 2 (12.5%)
CRF08_BC
 Primary Cluster Gejiu, Kaiyuan, Mengzi, Pingjian, Jianshui, Yuanyang, Jinping, Hekou, Wenshan, Yanshan, Maguan 4.78 41.2 4.4E-16 63 60 (95.2%) 1 (1.6%) 2 (3.2%)
 Secondary Cluster Zhaoyang, Ludian 4.24 13.0 1.5E-04 20 18 (90.0%) 0 2 (10.0%)
URFs
 Primary Cluster Tenchong, Ruili, Mangshi, Lianghe, Yingjiang, Longchuan 9.62 28.2 4.1E-11 23 14 (60.9%) 0 9 (39.1%)
 Secondary Cluster Kaiyuan, Mengzi, Pingbian, Hekou, Wenshan, Yanshan, Xichou, Maguan, Qiubei 3.51 7.7 2.4E-02 16 16 (100.0%) 0 0