Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8698–8703. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5270-08.2009

Table 1.

White matter changes associated with TM and FM recall and recognition

Cluster Side Cluster size (mm3) r Slope (FA/s) t value Peak coordinate
x y z
True memories
    Recall
        ILF R 1486 0.39 0.08 3.75 46 −25 −13
L 631 0.39 0.11 4.22 −44 −25 0
        IFO/ILF L 983 0.44 0.12 3.98 −33 −76 −4
    Recognition
        ILF R* 5953 0.46 0.07 5.43 40 −46 −6
L** 3818 0.35 0.06 4.86 −37 −52 −3
False memories
    Recall
        SLF anterior R 829 0.43 0.07 3.91 9 21 15
        SLF medial R 918 0.42 0.04 3.50 17 −1 34
        SLF posterior L 1500 0.45 0.05 3.65 −18 −34 33
        IFO/ILF R 1569 0.33 0.03 3.93 45 −54 −8
    Recognition
        SLF medial R 1052 0.41 0.05 3.16 21 15 22

All peak values reported were significant at p < 0.005 (uncorrected); 60 voxels spatial extent. Correlation coefficients (r) were calculated with the voxels comprising each cluster. For slope measure FA/s, s refers to the regressed memory scores. Peak coordinates of each cluster are reported in Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates. IFO, Inferior fronto-occipital fascicle; R, right; L, left.

* indicates regions that showed p values false discovery rate corrected at the whole-brain level (p < 0.05) and at the cluster level (p < 0.001).

** indicates regions that showed p values false discovery rate corrected at the whole-brain level (p < 0.05) and at the cluster level (p < 0.01).