Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;29(40):12653–12663. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-09.2009

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A–C, Controls based on simulated data using the firing rate profiles of the neurons presented in Figure 1. They show in solid black the joint-surprise function already shown in Figure 1D. Red curves illustrate statistics (solid indicate mean; dashed indicates 95% confidence limit) of joint-surprise curves resulting from 1000 simulations of independent, parallel spike trains generated as rate-modulated gamma processes based on the rate profiles estimated from the single trials. A, Poisson processes. B, C, Gamma processes with identical (B, κ = 4) and different (C, κ = 3 and 5) shape factors, assumed to be constant throughout the trial. Their choice in C is based on the estimated coefficient of variation (CV2) for the same pair of neurons (D) and is in the typical range of the whole population of neurons analyzed (E). E, Distribution of the CV2 values estimated as the average CV2 during the delay period from PS to GO, for all neurons.