Table 1.
Cell classification by tuning in task epochs
| Orientation tuning |
Grip type tuning |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cue | Plan | Move | Percentage | Cue | Plan | Move | Percentage |
| + | + | + | 30% | + | + | + | 12% |
| + | + | − | 11% | + | + | − | 4% |
| + | − | + | 6% | + | − | + | 3% |
| + | − | − | 8% | + | − | − | 6% |
| − | + | + | 7% | − | + | + | 15% |
| − | + | − | 3% | − | + | − | 6% |
| − | − | + | 12% | − | − | + | 28% |
| − | − | − | 23% | − | − | − | 26% |
Left, List of cell classes (different rows) according to the presence (+) or absence (−) of significant orientation tuning in the task epochs: cue, planning, and movement (2-way ANOVA, see Materials and Methods). Percentages indicate the fractional size of each class in our population (n = 571). Right, Corresponding classification for grip type tuning.