Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 9;29(49):15445–15454. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4195-09.2009

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of TSE incubation period

Inoculum Route Variance ratio (within controls) % Difference in incubation period (floxed PrP vs controls) Variance ratio (Schwann cell PrPknock-out vs controls) % Difference in incubation period (Schwann cell PrP knock-out vs controls)
139A Intracerebral 0.66ns +1.52 5.50* +4.09
139A Intraperitoneal 3.22* −14.89 9.31** +15.84
139A Oral 0.46ns +5.94 0.78ns −5.65
ME7 Intracerebral 3.24* −9.35 16.15*** +8.36
ME7 Intraperitoneal 2.51ns −10.00 10.65** +13.32
ME7 Oral 7.23** −11.44 3.43ns +4.65

Following ANOVA of incubation period data, the statistical significance of the variance ratios produced were calculated using F tests. The levels of statistical significance are indicated: ns Not significant (p > 0.05);

*p < 0.05;

**p < 0.01;

***p < 0.001.

The variance ratios and percentage differences in mean incubation periods are displayed between Schwann cell PrP knock-out mice and combined control groups. For comparison, the percentage difference in mean incubation periods within the control groups was calculated as the difference between the largest outlying control group (floxed PrP) and the remaining control groups. The difference in incubation periods observed between Schwann cell PrP knock-out mice and controls, following peripheral routes of inoculation (intraperitoneal and oral), is comparable to that observed among groups of animals expressing PrP normally, with similar statistical significance.