Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12183–12186. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1751-09.2009

Table 1.

Spatial coordinates of the local maxima of brain regions showing significant effects in the different contrasts

Contrast Anatomical region t value Cluster size Corrected p value Stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z)
Error > correct
    R posterior medial frontal cortex (BA 6/8/32) 6.97 279 <0.0001 4, 32, 38
    R anterior inferior insula (BA 47) 8.24 668 <0.0001 30, 24, −12
    L anterior inferior insula (BA 47) 7.92 463 <0.0001 −40, 22, −10
Positive outcome > negative outcome
    L ventral striatum 7.46 711 <0.0001 −22, 2, −12
    R ventral striatum 7.36 302 <0.0001 28, 0, −14
    R dorsal striatum 7.32 214 <0.0001 30, −16, 6
    R posterior cingulate (BA 31) 6.84 100 <0.0001 6, −40, 36
Agency × correctness (observed error processing > own-error processing)**
    R ventral striatum 11.08 1046 <0.0001 14, 6, −12
    L ventral striatum 9.49 970 <0.0001 −16, 6, −10
    Posterior cingulate (BA 31) 6.20 202 <0.0001 12, −44, 36

Stereotactic coordinates correspond to the standard Montreal Neurological Institute brain.

**Neither the remaining two-way interactions nor the three-way interaction (agency × correctness × context) showed any significant activations. R, Right; L, left.