Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2018 Oct 14;36(48):7331–7337. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.026

Table 2.

Accuracy of test methods in determining averted cases in simulated data*.

Method No. of cases without vaccination Averted cases Proportion averted, % Errors: % difference in averted cases compared with reference model
Reference model 120,000 28,768 24.0 NA
Test method 1 117,408 26,176 22.3 −9.01
Test method 2 120,043 28,811 24.0 0.15
Test method 3 120,014 28,782 24.0 0.05
Test method 4 121,064 29,832 24.6 3.70
Test method 5 122,386 31,153 25.5 8.29
Test method 6 123,957 32,725 26.4 13.76
Test method 7 119,598 28,365 23.7 −1.40
* Simulated input data characteristics
Beginning population 1,000,000
Vaccinated, % of population 55%
Vaccination month (mean, ±standard deviation) 3.6 ± 1.5
Vaccine effectiveness, % 48%
No. of cases with vaccination 91,232
Cases month (mean ± standard deviation) 6.5 ± 1.2
Vaccination timing, % 90%

Notes: months counted from August, month 3 indicates October and month 6 indicates January; vaccination timing indicates proportion of vaccine doses given before cases occurred (see Methods).

See Methods and Supplemental Table 2 for details of test methods. The current method is method 1.