Table 2.
Accuracy of test methods in determining averted cases in simulated data*.
Method † | No. of cases without vaccination | Averted cases | Proportion averted, % | Errors: % difference in averted cases compared with reference model |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reference model | 120,000 | 28,768 | 24.0 | NA |
Test method 1 | 117,408 | 26,176 | 22.3 | −9.01 |
Test method 2 | 120,043 | 28,811 | 24.0 | 0.15 |
Test method 3 | 120,014 | 28,782 | 24.0 | 0.05 |
Test method 4 | 121,064 | 29,832 | 24.6 | 3.70 |
Test method 5 | 122,386 | 31,153 | 25.5 | 8.29 |
Test method 6 | 123,957 | 32,725 | 26.4 | 13.76 |
Test method 7 | 119,598 | 28,365 | 23.7 | −1.40 |
* Simulated input data characteristics | ||||
Beginning population | 1,000,000 | |||
Vaccinated, % of population | 55% | |||
Vaccination month (mean, ±standard deviation) | 3.6 ± 1.5 | |||
Vaccine effectiveness, % | 48% | |||
No. of cases with vaccination | 91,232 | |||
Cases month (mean ± standard deviation) | 6.5 ± 1.2 | |||
Vaccination timing, % | 90% |
Notes: months counted from August, month 3 indicates October and month 6 indicates January; vaccination timing indicates proportion of vaccine doses given before cases occurred (see Methods).
See Methods and Supplemental Table 2 for details of test methods. The current method is method 1.