Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: World Dev. 2017 Mar 7;95:55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.017

Table 10.

Qualitative sample by background characteristics (female) in rural Kaputa district

Interview Age (years) [48-month follow up] Current Marital Status Changes in sole or joint decision making over quantitative evaluation CGP Treatment Status Male Partner Interviewed
1 40 Married Negative Control Yes
2 28 Married Negative Control Yes
3 23 Married Negative Treatment No
4 43 Married Negative Treatment No
5 42 Married Negative Treatment Yes
6 24 Married Negative Treatment No
7 31 Married Positive Control Yes
8 40 Married Positive Treatment Yes
9 34 Married Positive Treatment No
10 64 Married Positive Treatment No
11 42 Married Positive Treatment No
12 44 Married Positive Treatment No
13 38 Married Positive Treatment Yes
14 34 Married Positive Treatment No
15 25 Married Positive Treatment No
16 52 Married Positive Treatment Yes
17 34 Married Positive Treatment Yes1
18 40 Not Married Negative Control No
19 26 Not Married Negative Control No
20 52 Not Married Negative Treatment No
21 43 Not Married Negative Treatment Yes
22 29 Not Married Negative Treatment No
23 28 Not Married Negative Treatment No
24 22 Not Married No Change Control No
25 70 Not Married No Change Treatment No
26 48 Not Married No Change Treatment No
27 34 Not Married No Change Treatment Yes
28 38 Not Married No Change Treatment No
29 23 Not Married No Change Treatment No
30 48 Not Married Positive Treatment No

Notes: Currently not married includes women who have never been married, are widowed, divorced or separated at the time of the qualitative survey.

1

As no male partner was available at the time of the survey, a female household member was interviewed to gain an alternative perspective on decision making.