Table 13.

OLS and probit ANCOVA estimates on the average impact of the CGP on women’s sole or joint decision making

	Children’s health	Children’s schooling	Own income	Partner’s income	Major purchases	Daily purchases	Children’s clothes or shoes	Family visits	Own health
Unadjusted Models
Program Impact (OLS)	0.012	0.033	0.033	0.056	0.003	0.006	0.016	0.029	0.009
	(0.015)	(0.019)*	(0.013)**	(0.021)**	(0.020)	(0.012)	(0.011)	(0.021)	(0.016)
Program Impact (Probit)	0.012	0.033	0.033	0.056	0.002	0.005	0.015	0.030	0.009
	(0.015)	(0.020)*	(0.013)**	(0.022)***	(0.020)	(0.012)	(0.011)	(0.021)	(0.016)
Adjusted Models
Program Impact (OLS)	0.016	0.039	0.036	0.058	0.010	0.009	0.020	0.035	0.014
	(0.015)	(0.018)**	(0.013)***	(0.021)***	(0.017)	(0.011)	(0.011)*	(0.020)*	(0.015)
Program Impact (Probit)	0.016	0.040	0.036	0.060	0.011	0.008	0.019	0.038	0.014
	(0.014)	(0.018)**	(0.012)***	(0.021)***	(0.018)	(0.011)	(0.011)*	(0.021)*	(0.014)
N	6,084	6,087	5,339	4,239	6,080	6,087	6,087	6,079	6,086

Notes: Estimations use OLS or Probit ANCOVA models. Probit coefficients are reported as marginal effects. Robust standard errors at the CWAC level are in parentheses. Asterisks indicate significance level:

^*p < 0.1,

^**p < 0.05,

^***p < 0.01.

Adjusted models include baseline values of the decision-making indicator as well as the following controls: woman’s age, indicator for whether woman has completed primary education or more, indicator for whether woman is married or cohabiting, household demographic composition (number of children 0–5 years, number of children 6–18 years, number of females 19 and older, number of males 19 and older in the household), per capita (logged) household monthly expenditures, survey wave indicators, and indicators for district of residence.