Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;97(8):3379–3389. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz183

Table 5.

Effects of lipid peroxidation dose and BW on serum oxidative status and antibody titers of nursery pigs1

Level of peroxidation2 BW group3 P-value
Item 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% SEM Light Heavy SEM Perox4 Linear Quad BW Perox*BW
Vitamin E, ppm 1.24 1.32 1.23 0.99 1.15 0.06 1.12 1.24 0.04 0.004 0.011 1.000 0.033 0.275
8OHdG, pg/mL5 1,799 2,034 1,948 2,002 1,686 164 1,987 1,801 104 0.530 0.623 0.120 0.209 0.636
TAC, µM Trolox eq/mL6 100.0 97.1 89.1 84.7 92.9 4.13 88.4 97.1 2.60 0.069 0.051 0.102 0.021 0.842
MDA, µm7 9.08 10.93 10.20 9.26 9.25 0.54 8.90 10.58 0.38 0.153 0.487 0.087 0.003 0.757
Protein carbonyl, pmol/mg 1,214 1,237 1,200 1,201 1,189 29.2 1,203 1,213 18.5 0.810 0.363 0.780 0.711 0.411
Mhyo, S/P ratio8,9,10 0.164 0.100 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.177 0.600 0.032 0.265 0.663
PCV2, S/P ratio8,9,10 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.33 0.02 0.32 0.29 0.01 0.589 0.177 0.984 0.111 0.107

1Each value within level of peroxidation represents a mean of 20 pigs and each value within BW group represents a mean of 50 pigs.

2Peroxidized corn oil was created by heating (65 °C) corn oil with constant air supply (20 L/min) for 12 d. Oil was stabilized with liquid antioxidant (TBHQ) after peroxidation. Treatments represent a control diet with 5% refined, bleached, and deodorized corn oil (0% peroxidation) and a diet with 5% peroxidized corn oil (100% peroxidation). Intermediate diets were created by mixing the control and peroxidized diets on-farm.

3Pigs sampled on day 33 of the study were grouped into light (mean BW was 12.0 kg) and heavy (mean BW was 21.8 kg) BW groups.

4Main effect of peroxidized corn oil. Main effects were partitioned into linear, quadratic (Quad), cubic, and fourth degree polynomials for trend analysis of peroxidation treatments

58-Hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine.

6Total antioxidant capacity.

7Malondialdehyde.

8Antibody titers to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2).

9Titer results are presented as the sample to positive (S/P) ratio, calculated as the sample absorbance minus the negative control mean, divided by the difference between the positive and negative control means.

10Main effect of sampling day (P < 0.001). Titers were 0.06 vs. 0.22 for Mhyo and 0.26 vs. 0.35 for PCV2 when measured on days 33 and 43, respectively.