Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2018 Apr 21:10.1111/add.14251. doi: 10.1111/add.14251

Table 2.

Class enumeration fit indices and qualities for longitudinal latent class analyses, stratified by gender: Growing Up Today Study, 2003–2010.

Classes Free parameters BIC BF cmP AWE Entropy
Women
1 144 200031 <1 0.00 201 895 NA
2 289 177553 <1 0.00 181 296 0.875
3 434 170 637 <1 0.00 176 256 0.848
4 579 168055 <1 0.00 175 553 0.828
5 724 167337 <1 0.00 176 712 0.817
6 869 167 004 > 10 1.00 178 257 0.798
7 1014 167091 > 10 0.00 180 222 0.779
8 1159 167369 > 10 0.00 182 376 0.777
9a 1304 167 720 NA 0.00 184 605 0.778
Men
1 144 111 869 <1 0.00 113 791 NA
2 289 99 323 <1 0.00 103 180 0.860
3 434 95437 <1 0.00 101 228 0.838
4 579 94 504 <1 0.00 102 229 0.818
5 724 94 380 >10 1.00 104 040 0.779
6 869 94518 >10 0.00 106 113 0.762
7 1014 94953 NA 0.00 108 484 0.754

Models were estimated with samples of 7470 women and 5033 men. Bold type indicates the model we selected for each gender (i.e., the 6 class model for women, and the the 5 class model for men). BIC = Bayesian information criterion; BF = Bayes factor; cmP = correct model probability; AWE = approximate weight of evidence criterion; NA = not applicable. The likelihood ratio χ2 goodness-of-fit tests could not be computed in Mplus because the latent class indicator model was too large. Bootstrap likelihood ratio test could not be estimated because we employed the COMPLEX command in Mplus to adjust for non-independence within sibling clusters.

a

Model was not well identified.