Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;8(8):giz096. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz096

Table 1:

Comparison of precision, recall, F-score, and FDR for the assembly-free and the CoMW (assembly-based) approaches using all 3 databases based on best F-score

Database Approach Threshold Threshold category Recall Precision F-score FDR (%)
eggNOG Assembly-free BTS 120 Strict (TH) 0.9880 0.9540 0.9707 4.5977
CoMW 1.00E−15 Strict (TH) 0.9851 0.9939 0.9895 0.6006
CAZy Assembly-free BTS 110 Strict (TH) 0.3510 0.5325 0.4231 46.7433
CoMW 1.00E−08 Medium (TM) 0.8131 0.7759 0.7940 22.4096
NCycDB Assembly-free BTS 150 Strict (TH) 0.1666 0.0581 0.0862 94.1860
CoMW 1.00E−14 Strict (TH) 0.6666 0.8333 0.7407 16.6666

Full table for both approaches and databases can be seen in Tables S1–S3. Boldface emphasizes better precision, recall, F-score, and FDR in each database between both approaches.