Table 2.
Reference | Selection Bias (Randomization and allocation concealment) | Risk of bias due to deviation from intended interventions (e.g., adherence) | Risk of bias due to missing outcome data | Risk of bias in measurement of levo-triiodothyronine (L-T3) preference outcome with explanation | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appelhof et al. (14) | Low | Some concerns* | Low | Some concernsμ Explanation: Subjective appreciation of L-T3 compared to pre-trial L-T4 was rated by the participants on a 5-point scale (much better, somewhat better, the same, somewhat worse, or much worse), and those who indicated much or somewhat better were categorized as preferring L-T3. Unclear if validated scale. |
Low |
Bunevicius et al. (15) | Some concerns* | Some concerns* | Low | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Bunevicius et al. (16) | Some concerns* | Some concerns* | High (23% loss randomized participants) | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Escobar-Morreale et al. (17) | Low | Low | Low | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Nygaard et al. (18) | Some concerns† | Some concerns* | Some concerns (13% loss randomized participants) | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Rodriguez et al. (19) | Low | Some concerns* | Some concerns (10% loss randomized participants) | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Walsh et al. (20) | Some concerns‡ | Low | Low | Some concernsμ Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided. |
Low |
Insufficient detail reported in the manuscript.
The levothyroxine component of combination therapy was open label for dose adjustment.
Sealed envelopes were used but there was no report of whether these were opaque (to ensure that the treatment allocation was not visible through the envelope).
Some concerns, if there was no validated questionnaire outcome measure for treatment preference.