Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;10:477. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00477

Table 2.

Quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials.

Reference Selection Bias (Randomization and allocation concealment) Risk of bias due to deviation from intended interventions (e.g., adherence) Risk of bias due to missing outcome data Risk of bias in measurement of levo-triiodothyronine (L-T3) preference outcome with explanation Selective outcome reporting
Appelhof et al. (14) Low Some concerns* Low Some concernsμ
Explanation: Subjective appreciation of L-T3 compared to pre-trial L-T4 was rated by the participants on a 5-point scale (much better, somewhat better, the same, somewhat worse, or much worse), and those who indicated much or somewhat better were categorized as preferring L-T3. Unclear if validated scale.
Low
Bunevicius et al. (15) Some concerns* Some concerns* Low Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
Bunevicius et al. (16) Some concerns* Some concerns* High (23% loss randomized participants) Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
Escobar-Morreale et al. (17) Low Low Low Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
Nygaard et al. (18) Some concerns Some concerns* Some concerns (13% loss randomized participants) Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
Rodriguez et al. (19) Low Some concerns* Some concerns (10% loss randomized participants) Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
Walsh et al. (20) Some concerns Low Low Some concernsμ
Explanation: At the end of the trial, participants asked which treatment was preferred. Unclear if standardized instrument or wording or if what response options may have been provided.
Low
*

Insufficient detail reported in the manuscript.

The levothyroxine component of combination therapy was open label for dose adjustment.

Sealed envelopes were used but there was no report of whether these were opaque (to ensure that the treatment allocation was not visible through the envelope).

μ

Some concerns, if there was no validated questionnaire outcome measure for treatment preference.