Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;11(3):313–319. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1891

Table II.

Univariate analysis of sonographic features in DCIS and DCISM.

Sonographic features DCIS, n=83 (%) DCISM, n=53 (%) P-value
Mass 47 (56.6) 25 (47.2) 0.281
Shape 0.158
  Oval 9 (19.1) 1 (4.0)
  Irregular 38 (80.9) 24 (96.0)
Orientation 0.364
  Parallel 38 (80.9) 23 (92.0)
  Not parallel 9 (19.1) 2 (8.0)
Margin 0.015
  Circumscribed 12 (25.5) 0 (0.0)
  Not circumscribed 35 (74.5) 25 (100.0)
Echo pattern 0.502
  Hypoechoic 44 (93.6) 25 (100.0)
  Complex cystic and solid 3 (6.4) 0 (0.0)
Posterior features 0.999
  No posterior features or enhancement 42 (89.4) 23 (92.0)
  Shadowing or combined pattern 5 (10.6) 2 (8.0)
Non-mass abnormality 36 (43.4) 28 (52.8) 0.381
  Layered duct-like structures without a distinct mass with a zebra pattern or with small nodules less than 3 mm in diameter 28 (77.8) 25 (89.3)
  Ductal dilation 8 (22.2) 3 (10.7)
Vascularity 0.002
  Absent 37 (44.6) 10 (18.9)
  Present 46 (55.4) 43 (81.1)
Calcification 0.003
  Absent 56 (67.5) 22 (41.5)
  Present 27 (32.5) 31 (58.5)

DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; DCISM, ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.