Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 31;9:11124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47687-3

Table 2.

Sensitivity analyses of NAFLD and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Categories All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality
n HR (95% CI) I2 (%) n HR (95% CI) I2 (%)
Using a random-effects model to pool risk estimates of included studies 12 1.34 (1.17–1.54) 80.0 7 1.13 (0.92–1.38) 57.5
Using a fixed-effects model to pool risk estimates of included studies 12 1.28 (1.21–1.35) 80.0 7 1.09 (0.96–1.23) 57.5
Excluding studies using the general population as the reference group 9 1.34 (1.11–1.61) 82.7 6 1.05 (0.87–1.27) 44.7
Excluding studies using liver biopsy to diagnose NAFLD 8 1.28 (1.07–1.54) 73.2 4 1.05 (0.81–1.37) 64.3
Excluding studies conducted in the population with comorbidity 8 1.27 (1.10–1.48) 78.8 5 1.15 (0.89–1.49) 71.1
Excluding studies with sample size more than 10000 8 1.40 (1.22–1.61) 25.0 4 1.24 (0.78–1.97) 74.7
Excluding studies with sample size less than 1000 8 1.32 (1.12–1.55) 84.8 6 1.14 (0.92–1.41) 64.3
Excluding studies without full adjustment for confoundersa 7 1.42 (1.17–1.73) 78.6 4 1.01 (0.85–1.20) 41.6

aFull adjustment refers to adjustment for age, sex and ≥3 important confounders (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, smoking, alcohol, body mass index, physical activity and socioeconomic status as well as factors associated with these confounders.