Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2019 Apr 23;27(4):1190–1204.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.086

Table 1. Non-conventional taxa significantly overrepresented in BALs relative to controls.

See also Table S6.

BALs without CF Pathogens1
No non-conventional taxa were significantly overrepresented in BALs without CF pathogens as compared to controls2
BALs with CF Pathogens3
Taxa overrepresented vs. controls2 Relative abundance in controls3 Relative abundance in BALs4 Fold difference5 p value6
Streptococcus 0.88% 4.90% 3 1.9 × 10−4
Prevotella 0.40% 2.23% 2 1.6 × 10−5
Veillonella 0.07% 0.48% 3 5.9 × 10−7
Alcaligenaceae 0.00% 1.72% 19 9.9 ×10−19
1

BALs considered “without CF pathogens” contained less than 150% maximum value in instrument and reagent controls (i.e. <164 CF pathogen genome copies/ml).

2

Based on results of negative binomial test (see text)

3

BALs considered “with CF pathogens” contained more than 150% of the maximum value in instrument and reagent controls (i.e. >164 CF pathogen genome copies/ml).

3

Mean relative abundance of OTU in all catheter pre-washes, scope pre-washes, and reagent controls studied.

4

Mean relative abundance of OTU in all BALs studied.

5

Fold difference calculated by dividing reads of indicated taxa in BALs by level in controls.

6

p-values are for taxa abundance in BAL relative to controls.