Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2019 Sep 1;33(11):1729–1737. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002284

Table 3:

Comparison of the frequency of DRMs between 1st and 2nd line recipients

Mutations Total
n (%)
1st line
112(70%)
2nd line
48(30%)
P value
Total DRMs 137(86) 105(94) 32(67) P<0.001*
NRTIs 96(60) 80(71) 16(33) P<0.001*
M184V 85(53) 73(65) 12(25) P<0.001*
K65R 41(25) 38(34) 3(6) P<0.001*
K70R 9(6) 6(5) 3(6) P=0.812
TAMs 38(24) 29(26) 9(19) P=0.345
NNRTIs 137(85) 105(93) 32(67) P<0.001*
K103N 58(36) 51(45) 7(15) P<0.001*
Y181C 45(28) 31(27) 14(29) P=0.82
G190A 57(35) 44(39) 13(27) P=0.150
V106AM 45(28) 41(36) 4(8) P<0.001*
Mutations to NRTIs+NNRTIs 96(60) 80(71) 16(33) P<0.001*
PI mutations 5(3) 0 5(10) #
M46I 4(3) 0 4(8) #
N88S 2(1) 0 2(4) #
I84IV 1(1) 0 1(2) #

DRMs drug resistance mutations; NRTIs nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; TAMs thymidine analogue mutations; NNRTIs non-NRTIs, PI protease inhibitor; 1st line regimen was comprised of 2NRTIs+ NNRTI; 2nd line regimen was comprised of 2NRTIs + PI; # not computed.