Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 21;110(2):401–409. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz056

TABLE 1.

Study participant characteristics1

Characteristic Value
n 551
Age, y 32.6 ± 0.2
Time from parturition to milk sampling, d2 33.7 ± 0.6
Annual family income, %
 Lower income (≤$60,000) 16.9
 Middle-high income (>$60,000) 78.5
 Missing 4.5
Maternal education, %
 < Postsecondary 8.7
 College/trade school diploma or undergraduate degree 63.9
 Graduate degree 27.2
 Missing 0.2
Time of collection, %
 Morning 16.0
 Afternoon 8.0
 Evening 8.3
 Overnight 2.2
 Combined 57.5
 Missing 8.0
Foremilk or hindmilk, %
 Foremilk 13.1
 Hindmilk 8.9
 Combined 68.6
 Missing 9.4
FA-supplement use, %3
 Nonuser 28.3
 User 71.7
Total daily supplemental FA intake among supplement users (µg), median (range)3 1000 (63, 10,000)
Breast milk folates (nmol/L)
 Total folate4 116.1 ± 1.9
 Reduced folates5 68.9 ± 1.3
 5-methyl-THF 47.5 ± 1.0
 UMFA6 47.2 ± 1.6
Prevalence of detectable UMFA in breast milk, %6 96.2
1

Data are presented as mean ± SE, percentage, or median (range). FA, folic acid; THF, tetrahydrofolate; UMFA, unmetabolized folic acid.

2

n = 522.

3

Based on self-reported consumption of an FA-containing supplement. Total daily FA from supplements was based on the sum of FA content from all vitamin supplements.

4

Total folate is the sum of UMFA, THF, 5-methyl-THF, 5,10-methenyl-THF, and 5-formyl-THF.

5

Reduced folates represents the sum of THF, 5-methyl-THF, 5,10-methenyl-THF, and 5-formyl-THF.

6

The limit of detection for UMFA was <0.9 nmol/L.