Skip to main content
. 2015 May 12;2015(5):CD009080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009080.pub2

Comparison 1. Vitrectomy versus observation.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mean visual acuity (logMAR) at 6‐12 months 3 273 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.16 [‐0.23, ‐0.09]
2 Mean visual acuity (logMAR) at 3 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Mean visual acuity (logMAR) at 24 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Hole closure at 6‐12 months 3 265 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 31.41 [14.90, 66.25]
5 Reading acuity at 6 months 2 154 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.17 [‐0.26, ‐0.07]
6 Reading speed (word/minute) at 6 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Hole closure at 6‐12 months 3 265 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 38.93 [16.88, 89.78]
7.1 Stage II hole 2 77 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 22.98 [6.33, 83.46]
7.2 Stage III/IV hole 2 188 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 54.28 [18.05, 163.26]