Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD001973. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001973.pub4
Methods Location: USA.
Number of centres: Multicentre.
Funding source: Inter America Pharmaceuticals.
Recruitment period: Not stated.
Participants Inclusion: Adults with moderate oral mucositis pain after chemotherapy of chemoradiotherapy with clinically obvious mucosal changes consistent with oral mucositis.
Exclusion: Patients taking systemic analgesics or anti‐inflammatory drugs or those using topical anaesthetics.
44 randomised, 44 completed.
Interventions Gr A (n = 25): Benzydamine 0.15% in mouthwash base. Swish and hold 15 ml of solution for 1 min every 2 hours. Minimum of 5 doses per day.
Gr B (n = 19): Placebo. Swish and hold 15 ml of solution for 1 min every 2 hours. Minimum of 5 doses per day.
Study length min 9 hours, max 10 days.
Outcomes Patients assessment of pain relief at day 1. We dichotomised this as poor versus fair to excellent and used this as an outcome for whether mucositis had improved or not.
Notes Sample size calculation reported (post hoc): to have a 90% chance of detecting a significant difference between placebo and benzydamine solutions (assuming placebo 45% effective and benzydamine 65%) would require 105 subjects per arm, if difference in effectiveness between the groups is increased to 25% (45% and 70%) then would need 75 subjects per group. Study planned to accrue 214 subjects.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Quote: 'A multicentre double blind controlled trial was undertaken".
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk No information given.
Blinding of participants/carers? Low risk Double blind.
Blinding of outcome assessors? Low risk Double blind.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? Low risk All randomised patients included in outcome assessment.
Free of selective reporting? High risk Preliminary results reported, for pain at day 1 and duration of treatment.
Free of other bias? Unclear risk Unclear.