Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005167.pub2

Miklowitz 1996.

Methods Allocation: randomisation procedure using random number table. Randomisation sequence was concealed until assignments had been made. Duration: 9 months for therapy and 2 years of total follow up. Blinded assessments: reported. Analysis: Survival analysis using Kaplan‐Meier product‐limit formula and Cox proportional hazards models when incorporating covariates; mixed analysis of variance; ITT for survival analysis. 
 No of centres: not clear. 
 Country: USA
Participants Diagnosis: bipolar disorder (post‐episode phases) DSM‐III‐R (SCID‐P). A posteriori confirmation by DSM‐IV showed that two patients of the sample were bipolar II while the others (99) were bipolar I. 
 N: 101 (experimental group n=31; control group n=70). 
 Age: 18‐62 years (mean 35.6 sd 10.2). 
 Gender: 64 women and 37 men. 
 Setting: Family interventions performed at patients' homes. 
 Race: not informed. 
 History: mania, depression or mixed episode within the past 3 months, living with or in regular contact with a caregiving family member, willingness to take medication, english speaking. Excluded disability or neurologic disorder, alcohol or substance abuse disorder within the previous 6 months.
Interventions 1 ‐ Family‐Focused Therapy: 21 sessions (psychoeducation, communication enhancement training, problem‐solving skills training; 12 weekly, 6 biweekly, 3 monthly ‐ one‐hour). 2 ‐ Crisis Management: 2 one‐hour home based sessionsof family psychoeducation (within 2 months after entry) and more crisis intervention sessions during the rest of 9 months if necessary. All patients in both groups were receiving pharmacologic treatment (mood‐stabilizers and/or antipsychotics, antidepressants).
Outcomes USED: 
 1 ‐ Relapse at the end of treatment (24 months) ‐ 
 symptoms: SADS‐C (ranging from 1 (absent) to 7 (very extreme). 
 2 ‐ Medication compliance during follow up: all available compliance data and laboratory results were assembled into a dosier and assigned a 3‐point adherence rating ‐ 1 is fully nonadherent, 2 is partially nonadherent and 3 is fully adherent. 
 3 ‐ Dropouts 
 NOT USED: 
 4 ‐ Rehospitalization 
 5 ‐ Time to relapse ‐ survival analysis
Notes We have considered as relapsed the patients that have have been computed as dropouts during the study duration.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate