Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005167.pub2

van Gent 1991.

Methods Allocation: randomisation without methods specification. 
 Blinded assessments: not reported. 
 Duration: 12 months. 
 Analysis: Analysis of Variance for repeated measuresand Wilcoxon test. 
 N of centres: 1 
 Country: Netherlands
Participants Diagnosis: bipolar patients through DSM‐III‐R criteria, by two independent psychiatrists. 
 N: 39 (19 in experimental group and 20 in control group). 
 Age: Experimental group (partners) ‐ mean 42 (sd 12); control ‐ 56 (sd 8). Experimental group (patients) ‐ 44 (sd 11); control ‐ 55 (sd 8). 
 Gender: distribuition not mentioned. 
 Race: not mentioned. 
 Settingnot mentioned. 
 History: onset of illness in means (SD) of age for experimental group 26(10) and control 36(10). Duration of illness 18(10) years and 18(11) years respectively. Number of hospitalizations 4.4(4.5) and 4.4(2.8) respectively.
Interventions 1 ‐ Psychoeducation: Experimental group: requested to fill questionaires and take part in 5 sessions of structured psychoeducational intervention regarding the information about desease and medication plus practical advice. 
 2 ‐ Control group: only requested to fill questionaires. All patients were in pharmacological treatment with lithium.
Outcomes USED: 
 1 ‐ Patients' total symptoms (SCL‐90‐total), before/after intervention. 2 ‐ Patients' anxiety (subscale SCL‐90‐Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory), before/after intervention. 3 ‐ Medication compliance (compliant or not ‐ non compliance defined as a difference of more than 0.3mmol/l in serum lithium levels without changing the medication). 4 ‐ Rehospitalizations. 
 5 ‐ Dropouts 
 NOT USED: 
 6 ‐ Partners' knowledge of the illness. 
 7 ‐ Partners' social strategies.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear

BPRS: Brief Psychiatry Rating Scale 
 DSM‐III: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ‐ Third Edition 
 DSM‐III‐R: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ‐ Third Edition Revised 
 DSM‐IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ‐ Fourth Edition 
 N: total number of participants in the study 
 n: number of participants in a group of comparison 
 SADS‐C: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia ‐ Change Version 
 SCID: Structured Clinical Interview (DSM) 
 SCID‐P: Structured Clinical Interview‐ Patient Version 
 SCL: Symptom Checklist 
 SD: Standard Deviation 
 IMPORTANT: The distinction between bipolar I and II disorders became clear and formal after DSM‐IV, so in some of included studies this difference in diagnosis is not mentioned. In the Miller 2004 the authors did not mention a confirmation diagnostic procedure after the application of DSM‐III‐R criteria, but they have considered the sample as composed of bipolar I patients. In another context it should be clarified, but we did not consider indispensable the distinction between bipolar I and II disorders, for the objectives of this review.