Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005167.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Anderson 1986 The outcomes assessed were not clinical outcomes directly related to bipolar disorder ie they did not examine the impact of interventions on the disorder itself.
Catanzaro 1973 The study was not a RCT. It was a theoretical explanation of a type of family therapy.
Davenport 1977 The study was not a RCT.
Fitzgerald 1972 The study was not a RCT.
Fristad 2002 The outcomes considered in this study were not of direct clinical relevance. No data were presented on the possible impact of the intervention on the disorder.
Honig 1995 The study was not a RCT.
Kim 2004 This was not an primary RCT. Data were collected from two others studies, one of them included in the present review (Miklowitz 2003).
Miklowitz 2000 This paper reports on one year follow‐up data from the study by Miklowitz 2003, which is included in this review.
Simoneau 1999 This presents some results from the study reported by Miklowitz 2003, which is included in this review.