Table 3.
Detection performance when non-candidates for classification output were included in the learning.
| Sub. | Four commands | Three commands | Two commands | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | ITR (bits/min) | Accuracy (%) | ITR (bits/min) | Accuracy (%) | ITR (bits/min) | |
| 1 | 60.0 | 0.53 | 66.7 | 0.44 | 75.0 | 0.25 |
| 2 | 70.0 | 0.86 | 74.4 | 0.68 | 83.3 | 0.47 |
| 3 | 60.0 | 0.53 | 67.8 | 0.47 | 78.3 | 0.33 |
| 4 | 70.0 | 0.86 | 75.6 | 0.72 | 83.3 | 0.47 |
| 5 | 78.3 | 1.20 | 84.4 | 1.07 | 91.7 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 61.7 | 0.58 | 66.7 | 0.44 | 75.0 | 0.25 |
| 7 | 100 | 2.67 | 100 | 2.11 | 100 | 1.30 |
| 8 | 71.7 | 0.92 | 76.7 | 0.76 | 85.0 | 0.52 |
| 9 | 66.7 | 0.74 | 74.4 | 0.68 | 85.0 | 0.52 |
| 10 | 100 | 2.67 | 100 | 2.11 | 100 | 1.30 |
| Mean | 73.8 | 1.16 | 78.7 | 0.95 | 85.7 | 0.63 |
| SD | 14.2 | 0.78 | 11.8 | 0.61 | 8.6 | 0.38 |
The average results of all target combinations were presented for <5 commands.