Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;28(4):376–388. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000027

Table 2.

Meta-analyses of secondary outcomes

Meta-analysis Comparisons (N) Patients (N) SMDa 95% CI I2 (%) 95% CI p
PTSD (follow-up) 13 711 −1.08 −1.81 to −0.35 83 72–89 0.004
Depression (follow-up) 8 371 −1.28 −2.27 to −0.30 88 79–93 0.010
Anxiety (follow-up) 3 171 −0.49 −0.93 to −0.05 70 0–91 0.030
Drop-out rate (RR) 25 1636 0.96 0.82 to 1.13 0 0–52 0.620
Functioning (post-treatment) 4 547 −0.17 −0.58 to 0.24 74 27–91 0.420
Functioning (follow-up) 1 25 −0.81 −1.63 to 0.01 NA NA 0.050
Quality of life (post-treatment)b 5 173 0.23 −0.08 to 0.54 0 0–79 0.140
Quality of life (follow-up)b 5 174 0.27 −0.08 to 0.63 17 0–83 0.130

N, number; SMD, standardised mean difference; CI, confidence interval; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.

a

Negative values favour active interventions.

b

Positive values favour active interventions.