Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;13(8):1763–1777. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12526

Table 2.

Molecular metastasis subtypes MetA‐C in relation to metastasis and primary tumor morphology. Continuous variables given as median (25th; 75th percentiles).

  MetA (n = 51) MetB (n = 12) MetC (n = 9)
Bone metastases
AR score (0–12) 8 (4;12) 10 (6;12) 9 (4;12)
(n = 49) (n = 12) (n = 8)
PSA score (0–12) 9 (6;12) 2 (1;6)***a 6 (1;9)*a
(n = 51) (n = 12) (n = 9)
Ki67 (%) 14 (9;20) 33 (22; 45)***a 12 (8;28)*b
(n = 50) (n = 12) (n = 9)
Chromogranin‐A (%) 0 (0;0.2) 0.2 (0;1.6)P = 0.05 a 0 (0;0)
(n = 45) (n = 12) (n = 9)
Cellular atypia (moderate; high) 34; 17 2; 10**a 2; 7*a
Gland formation (yes; no) 20; 31 0; 12**a 4; 5*a
  MetA associated (n = 36) MetB associated (n = 8) MetC associated (n = 8)
Primary tumor
AR score (0–12) 12 (12;12) 12 (10;12) 10.5 (8;12)
(n = 34) (n = 8) (n = 8)
PSA score (0–12) 9 (8;12) 6 (4;8)**a 7 (6;10.5)
(n = 32) (n = 8) (n = 8)
Ki67 (%) 9 (6.5;14) 19 (15;26)**a 17 (11;30)*a
(n = 35) (n = 8) (n = 8)
AR tumor stroma score (% of stroma cells positive) 22 (15;30) 11 (4;17)*a 17 (7;20)
(n = 34) (n = 8) (n = 8)
Reactive stroma score (1; 2; 3) 11; 11; 0 0; 2; 7***a 0; 6; 1*a, *b

Metastasis subtype, MetA‐C, as determined from PCA of whole genome expression profiles followed by unsupervised clustering (Fig. 1). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, asignificantly different from MetA, bsignificantly different from MetB.