Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;13(8):1623–1650. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12537

Table 1.

Previous CTC studies focusing on pancreatic cancer

Enrichment strategy   Refs N Stage Detection strategy   Detection rate Enumeration
IM
CellSearch®
EpCAM Dotan et al. (2016) 48 IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+, MUC‐1+ 48% (23/48) (≥ 1 CTC): 13% (6/48) (≥ 2 CTCs); 8% (3/37) (≥ 2 CTCs) at first evaluation after Tx NA
Piegeler et al. (2016) 8 IB (n = 1)
IIB (n = 1)
III (n = 2)
IV (n = 4)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 87.5% (7/8): 100% (1/1) in Stage IB; 100% (1/1) in Stage IIB; 100% (2/2) in Stage III; 75% (3/4) in Stage IV Median 4.5 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 0–83 CTCs/7.5 mL
Bissolati et al. (2015) 20 R IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+ 20% (4/20) in PB
40% (8/20) in PV
NA
Catenacci et al. (2015) 14 IIB‐IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/EpCAM+ 21.4% (3/14) in PB
100% (14/14) in PV
(1) In PB, mean 0.7 CTCs/7.5 mL, median 0 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 0–7 CTCs/7.5 mL. (2) In PV, mean 125.64 CTCs/7.5 mL, median 68.5 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 1–516 CTCs/7.5 mL
Earl et al. (2015) 35 R (n = 10)
LA (n = 11)
M (n = 14)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 20% (7/35) in total
10% (1/10) in R
42.8% (6/14) in M
Mean 0.77 CTCs/7.5 mL in total, mean 0.1 CTCs/7.5 mL in R, mean 1.9 CTCs/7.5 mL in M
Bidard et al. (2013) 79 III IF CD45−/CK+, EGFR 5% (4/75) at baseline
9% (5/56) at first evaluation
11% (9/79) in total
50% (2/4) in Stage IV (control)
1–15 CTCs/7.5 mL
Kurihara et al. (2008) 26a II (n = 1)
III (n = 1)
IVA (n = 10)
IVB (n = 14)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+ 42% (11/26) in total
45.8% (11/24) in Stage IV
Mean 16.9 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 1–105 CTCs/7.5 mL
Allard et al. (2004) 16a IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+ 19% (4/21) (≥ 2 CTCs) of the samples Mean 2 ± 6 CTCs/7.5 mL, median 3.5 CTCs/7.5 mL
IM
CellCollector®
EpCAM El‐Heliebi et al. (2018) 15 I (n = 7)
II‐III (n = 6)
NA (n = 2)
RCA, IF KRAS, DAPI+/CD45−/CK18 or PanCK± 47% (7/15)
KRAS mut 40% (6/15)
Range 1–3 CTCs/patient, KRAS mut 1–8 RCPs/CTC, KRAS wt 1–2 RCPs/CTC
IM
MACS
EpCAM Effenberger et al. (2018) 69 I (n = 2)
II (n = 30)
III (n = 10)
IV (n = 27)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 33.3% (23/69) Range 1–19 CTCs/7.5 mL
  Zhou et al. (2011) 25a I‐II (n = 5)
III (n = 8)
IV (n = 12)
RT–PCR h‐TERT, CK20, CEA, C‐MET 100% (25/25) NA
IM
Dynabeads®
MUC1
EpCAM
de Albuquerque et al. (2012) 34 II‐IV RT–PCR KRT19, MUC1, EPCAM, CEACAM5, BIRC5 47.1% (16/34): 20.6% for KRT19 and MUC1; 23.5% for EPCAM; 2.9% for CEACAM5; 17.6% for BIRC5 NA
IM anti‐cMET Zhang et al. (2016b) 7 NA IF, FISH DAPI+/CD45−/c‐MET+, MET FISH 0% with c‐MET CTC assay
14% (1/7) with CellSearch®
Range 0–1 CTCs/7.5 mL (CellSearch®)
IM
SE
CD45(−) Zhang et al. (2015b) 22a I (n = 2)
II (n = 10)
III (n = 4)
IV (n = 6)
IF, FISH DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ and/or CEP8 signal number > 2, DAPI+/CD45−/CK− and CEP8 signal number > 2 68.2% (15/22) (≥ 2 CTCs) in total: 9.1% (2/22) with CK+; 59.1% (13/22) with CK−; 9.1% (2/22) (> 10 CTCs); 78.6% (11/14) (≥ 2 CTCs) in PDAC Median 3 CTCs/3.5 mL, range 0–60 CTCs/3.5 mL, 60 CTCs/3.5 mL in a Pt with stage II, 14 CTCs/3.5 mL in a Pt with stage IV
IM
SE
CD45 (−) Wu et al. (2018) 19 IIA (n = 3)
IIB (n = 11)
III (n = 4)
IV (n = 1)
IF, FISH DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ and/or CEP8 signal number > 2 26.3% (5/19) CTMs in total: 21.1% (4/19) at baseline; 27.3% (3/11) in stage IIB; 25% (1/4) in stage III; 100% (1/1) in stage IV Median 5 CTCs/7.5 mL (at baseline), range 1–30 CTCs/7.5 mL (at baseline)
IM
SE
CD45 (−) Gao et al. (2016) 25 I (n = 5)
II (n = 8)
III (n = 6)
IV (n = 6)
IF, FISH DAPI+/CD45−/CK18 + or CEP8 signal number > 2 88% (22/25) Median 3 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 0–13 CTCs/7.5 mL
IM
MACS
CD45 (−) Zhang et al. (2015a) 13 NA IF, Aptamer, FISH DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+, DAPI+/CD45−/BC‐15+ 84.6% (11/13) Mean 34.4 CTCs/7.5 mL (panCK+), mean 24 CTCs/7.5 mL (BC‐15 + )
    Ren et al. (2011) 41 III‐IV IF DAPI+/CA19‐9 + /CK+ 80.5% (33/41) (≥ 2 CTCs) Mean 16.8 ± 16.0 CTCs/7.5 mL, range 0–59 CTCs/7.5 mL
SLB, μF
CMx chip
EpCAM Chang et al. (2016) 63 I (n = 1)
II (n = 32)
III (n = 10)
IV (n = 20)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+ 81% (51/63) CTCs
81% (51/63) CTMs (multiple cells ≥ 2 CTCs)
Mean 70.2 CTCs/2 mL, mean 29.5 CTMs/2 mL
    Tien et al. (2016) 41 IA‐III IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+ 39% (16/41) in PB
58.5% (24/41) in PV
(1) In PB, mean CTCs 92.0/2 mL, median CTCs 52.0/2 mL. (2) In PV, mean CTCs 313.4/2 mL, median CTCs 116.5/2 mL
IM, μF Parallel flow micro aperture chip EpCAM
anti‐CEA
Size‐based filtration
Chang et al. (2015) 12a IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 91.7% (11/12) Mean 26 ± 11 CTCs/8 mL, range 0–42 CTCs/8 mL, mean 31 CTCs/8 mL (untreated Pts), mean 22 CTCs/8 mL (treated Pts)
μF
Nanostructured capture
NanoVelcro chip
EpCAM Court et al. (2018) 100 I (n = 9)
II (n = 31)
III (n = 31)
IV (n = 29)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 78% (78/100): 44.4% (4/9) in stage I; 74.2% (23/31) in stage II; 77.4% (24/31) in stage III; 93.1% (27/29) in stage IV Median 2 (IQR 1–6) CTCs/4 mL in total, median 7 (IQR 3–13) CTCs/4 mL in occult metastatic Pts
μF
Micropost GEDI
Size‐based filtration
EpCAM
Rhim et al. (2014) 11 I (n = 1)
IIA (n = 1)
IIB (n = 1)
III (n = 1)
IV (n = 7)
IF DAPI+/CD45−, DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 73% (8/11) in PDAC
40% (8/21) in Cystic lesion
Mean 14.1 ± 18.1 CTCs/mL (PDAC), mean 4.5 ± 7.3 CTCs/mL (Cystic lesion)
μF
Cell surface capture
GEM
EpCAM Sheng et al. (2014) 18a IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 94.4% (17/18) Range 0–23 CTCs/7.5 mL
μF
Cell surface capture
BioFluidica
EpCAM Kamande et al. (2013) 12 R (n = 5)
M (n = 7)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/EpCAM+ 100% (7/7) in M Mean 53CTCs/mL in M, median 51 CTCs/mL in M, range 9–95 CTCs/mL in M, mean 11 CTCs/mL in R
μF
Cell surface capture
Slit filtrationeDAR
EpCAM
Size‐based filtration
Zhao et al. (2013) 10a IV IF Hoechst+/CD45 + /EpCAM+/CK+ 80% (8/10) Range 2–872 CTCs/mL
Size‐based filtration ISET Pore size 8.0 μm Poruk et al. (2016) 50 I (n = 8)
II (n = 38)IV (n = 4)
IF DAPI+/CD45−/panCK+, DAPI+/CD45−/vimentin+ 78% (39/50) with eCTCs
52% (26/50) with mCTCs
Median 30 eCTCs/mL, range 1–251 eCTCs/mL, median 3 mCTCs/mL, range 1–16 mCTCs/mL
    Khoja et al. (2012) 53 M or
Inoperable
Light microscope, IHC CD45−, Morphology 88.9% (24/27) (ISET)
39.6% (21/53) (CellSearch®)
Mean 26 CTCs/7.5 mL (ISET), median 9 CTCs/7.5 mL (ISET), range 0–240 CTCs/7.5 mL (ISET), mean 2 CTCs/7.5 mL (CellSearch®), median 0 CTCs/7.5 mL (CellSearch®) range 0–15 CTCs/7.5 mL (CellSearch®)
Size‐based filtration ScreenCell Pore size 7.5 μm Sefrioui et al. (2017) 58a L (n = 16)
LA (n = 18)
M (n = 24)
Light microscope Morphology 56% (33/49) in available samples: 57% (16/28) in L‐LA; 81% (17/21) in M Median 1 CTC/mL, range 0–151 CTCs/mL
    Kulemann et al. (2016) 21 IIA (n = 2)
IIB (n = 8)
III (n = 4)
IV (n = 7)
IF, Light microscope, IHC, PCR Hoechst+/CK+, Hoechst+/ZEB‐1 + , Morphology, KRAS 86% (18/21) including KRAS mut: 100% (2/2) in Stage IIA; 75% (6/8) in Stage IIB; 75% (3/4) in Stage III; 100% (7/7) in Stage IV
66.7% (14/21) with cytology only
23.8% (5/21) CTC clusters
57.1% (4/7) ZEB1 + in Stage IV
Mean 0.5 CTCs/3 mL, range 0–37 CTC/3 mL
    Cauley et al. (2015) 105 IA‐IV Light microscope Morphology 49% (51/105) NA
    Kulemann et al. (2015) 11 IIB (n = 4)
III (n = 3)
IV (n = 4)
Light microscope, RT–PCR Morphology, KRAS 18% (2/11) with cytology
73% (8/11) with KRAS mut: 75% (3/4) in Stage IIB; 100% (3/3) in Stage III; 50% (2/4) in Stage IV
NA
    Iwanicki‐Caron et al. (2013) 27 R (n = 9)
LA (n = 9)
M (n = 9)
Light microscope Morphology 55.6% (15/27) in total: 44.4% (4/9) in R; 66.7% (6/9) in LA; 55.6% (5/9) in M NA
Size‐based filtration FMSA (vs. CellSearch®) Microfiltration Ma et al. (2015) 2a IIB (n = 1)
IV (n = 1)
Ad5GTSe infection/GFP, IF GFP+, CK+/CD45− 100% (2/2) (FMSA), 50% (1/2) (CellSearch®) 13–30 CTCs/7.5 mL (FMSA), 0–1 CTCs/7.5 mL (CellSearch®)
Size‐based filtration
MetaCell
Pore size 8.0 μm Bobek et al. (2014) 17 I (n = 1)
IIA (n = 4)
IIB (n = 4)
III (n = 5)
IV (n = 3)
IF, Light microscope, IHC DAPI+/CK18 + , Morphology, MGS, CK, CEA, Vimentin 76.5% (13/17) in total: 78.6% (11/14) in Stage I‐III; 66.7% (2/3) in Stage IV NA
Density Gradient
Ficoll‐Paqueplus
Density Gradient Gorner et al. (2015) 6 II (n = 2)
III (n = 1)
IV (n = 3)
FACS
RT–PCR
Hoechst+/CD45−/EpCAM+, Integrin+, or MUC+, c‐MET, AGR2, EpCAM, Krt‐19, CD45 66.6% (4/6): 66.6% (2/3) in Stage II‐III; 66.6% (2/3) in Stage IV NA
CAM assay   Premasekharan et al. (2016) 2 IV FACS DAPI+/CD45−/CAMhigh/CD14low 100% (2/2) NA
oHSV1‐hTERT‐GFP Telomerase RT positive cancer cells
GFP+ (viable cells)
Zhang et al. (2016a) 17 IIB (n = 1)
III (n = 4)
IV (n = 12)
IF
FACS
CD45−/GFP+ 88.2% (15/17) Mean 43.1 CTCs/4 mL
No enrichment   Marrinucci et al. (2012) 18a IV IF DAPI+/CD45−/CK+ 61% (11/18) (≥ 2 CTCs), 50% (9/18) (≥ 5 CTCs) Mean 15.8 CTCs/mL

CAM, cell adhesion matrix; CTC, circulating tumor cell; CTM, Circulating tumor microemboli; eCTC, epithelial‐like CTC; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; IF, immunofluorescence; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IM, immunomagnetic; IQR, interquartile range; LA, locally advanced; M, metastatic; mCTC, mesenchymal‐like CTC; N, number of patients; NA, not available; PB, peripheral blood; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PV, portal vein; R, resectable; RCA, rolling‐circle amplification using padlock probe; RCP, rolling‐circle product; Refs, references; SE, subtraction enrichment; SLB, supported lipid bilayer; Tx, treatment; Pt, patient; μF, microfluidic.

a

 Various tumor types of pancreatic cancers are included.