Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;188(8):1529–1538. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz110

Table 1.

Summary of 5 Dengue Serosurveys in Singapore, 2004–2017

Survey Agency or Institution Age Range, years Sample Size (n) Survey Period ELISA Testa Source (First Author, Year (Reference No.))
National Health Surveyb MOH 18–74 4,152 September–December 2004 Panbio Dengue IgG Indirect ELISAc Yew, 2009 (24)
National Paediatric Seroprevalence Surveyb MOH 2–15 984 August 2008–July 2010 EUROIMMUN Anti-Dengue Virus ELISA (IgG)d Ang, 2015 (25)
2009 seroprevalence surveyb NEA/EHI 16–60 3,627 December 2009–February 2010 Panbio Dengue IgG Indirect ELISA Low, 2015 (21)
2013 seroprevalence survey NEA/EHI 16–71 3,813 December 2013–February 2014 Panbio Dengue IgG Indirect ELISA Present study
2017 seroprevalence survey NEA/EHI 16–74 4,002 June–August 2017 Panbio Dengue IgG Indirect ELISA Present study

Abbreviations: EHI, Environmental Health Institute; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MOH, Ministry of Health; NEA, National Environment Agency.

a The sensitivity (Panbio: 97.9%; EUROIMMUN: 100%) and specificity (Panbio: 100%; EUROIMMUN: 100%) of the Panbio and EUROIMMUN assays (as provided in the product inserts) were similar. Both assays were tested in a serum sample panel of patients with suspected dengue virus infection (n = 87), and the qualitative results of the two ELISAs were 99% in agreement (EUROIMMUN Anti-Dengue Virus ELISA (IgG) product information). This shows that the data from these studies may be used collectively for analysis. The total number of samples analyzed in these 5 studies was 16,578.

b A brief description of prior studies can be found in Web Appendix 1.

c Alere Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts.

d EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.