Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0184-5

Table 2.

Main regression results

Outcome variables (1) (2)
Ignoring time-dependent CDI exposure Using time-to-exposure stratification
Costs 1.08*** [1.00;1.15] 0.31*** [0.25;0.37]
 Marginal effect 23,313*** [20,772;25,854] 9016*** [7152;10,880]
Reimbursement 0.94*** [0.87;1.01] 0.29*** [0.23;0.352
 Marginal effect 18,678*** [16,580;20,776] 7838*** [6072;9605]
Extra length of stay 0.96*** [0.87;1.02] 0.22*** [0.18;0.26]
 Marginal effect 21.6*** [19.6;23.6] 6.4*** [5.1;7.8]
N 2709 2500

This table summarizes a total of six GLM regression analyses, each using a gamma distribution and a log link function. Each cell gives the effect of CDI infection on the respective outcome on the left from different GLM regressions. All regressions use a within-main-diagnosis estimation and control for comorbidities according to Resch (2008), for age, age2, and for sex. Regressions in the second column additionally apply a time-to-exposure stratification. 95% confidence intervals are in brackets

p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01