Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;18:44. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0469-8

Table 3.

Adjusted Logistic Regression for Independent Correlates of Dietary Habits (OR, 95%CI)

Fruits Vegetables Cacao Fish Sodas Fried Food Fast Food Junk Food
Age
 18–39 (ref)
 40–59 1.45 (0.68, 3.08) 2.25 (0.69, 7.98) 1.09 (0.53, 2.24) 1.04 (0.48, 2.24) 1.35 (0.64, 2.85) 1.29 (0.64, 2.60) 2.77 0.96, 7.98) 1.10 (0.36, 3.19)
 60–90 1.16 (0.40, 3.35) 0.43 (0.06, 3.26) 1.33 (0.48, 3.66) 3.24 (1.11, 9.44) 3.90 (1.38, 11.04) 0.51 (0.19, 1.40) 12.17 (2.00, 73.84) 0.58 (0.12, 3.07)
Sex
 Male (ref)
 Female 0.51 (0.22, 1.19) 0.69 (0.18, 2.66) 1.26 (0.56, 2.83) 1.20 (0.49, 2.90) 1.07 (0.46, 2.48) 0.79 (0.36, 1.73) 3.43 (1.23, 9.56) 0.41 (0.11, 1.55)
Education
 None (ref)
 Primary 0.44 (0.13, 1.51) 0.74 (0.11, 5.09) 0.82 (0.28, 2.40) 2.28 (0.71, 7.26) 1.44 (0.48, 4.28) 0.76 (0.26, 2.23) 4.83 (1.01, 23.0) 1.82 (0.27, 12.20)
 Secondary 0.43 (0.11, 1.67) 0.63 (0.08, 4.93) 0.99 (0.30, 3.26) 1.80 (0.50, 6.38) 1.87 (0.57, 6.20) 0.66 (0.20, 2.15) 1.37 (0.17, 10.84)
Monthly Income
 Poor (ref)
 Low-Moderate 0.38 (0.19, 0.78) 1.28 (0.35, 4.62) 0.58 (0.30, 1.14) 0.28 (0.13, 0.58) 0.35 (0.17, 0.73) 0.61 (0.31, 1.19) 0.15 (0.04, 0.46) 0.21 (0.06, 0.74)
 Moderate-High 0.28 (0.10, 0.75) 3.17 (0.72, 13.96) 0.27 (0.09, 0.81) 0.39 (0.13, 1.11) 0.97 (0.37, 2.58) 0.84 (0.32, 2.17) 0.31 (0.06, 1.42) 0.16 (0.02, 1.39)

Bold indicates significance at p < 0.05 based on logistic regression

Model is adjusted for sex, age, education, and monthly income

CI Confidence interval