Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4561–4577. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5683-07.2008

Table 1.

C50 analysis

Neuron type Number SacIn versus NoSac
< >
Total 79 21 (26.6) 2 (2.5)
Buildup 31 9 (29.0) 1 (3.2)
Visual motor 30 6 (20.0) 1 (3.3)
Visual tonic 11 5 (45.5) 0 (0)
Visual phasic 7 1 (14.3) 0 (0)

Changes in C50 with a cue to make a saccade. The total number of SC neurons is shown in the column titled Number. The numbers of neurons with a reduced C50 in the SacIn condition compared to the NoSac condition are indicated by the number in the column marked <. Those showing increased C50 in the SacIn condition are indicated in the column marked >. Percentages are indicated in parentheses. Only statistically significant differences are shown (Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Note that decreases in C50 indicate increases in neuronal sensitivity. See Materials and Methods for details on how C50 was determined. Of the 79 neurons in our sample, 50 of the neuronal CRFs were well fit with hyperbolic functions in both the SacIn and NoSac conditions (see Materials and Methods). Of these, 21 of 50 (42.0%; 21 of 79 = 26.6%) showed decreases in C50 (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05), indicating an increase in sensitivity with a cue to make a saccade.