Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;28(4):932–943. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3309-07.2008

Table 1.

Crystallographic data collection and refinement statistics

T686A:Quis T686A:Glu T686S:Glu
Data collection
    Space group C2 C2 P21
    Cell dimensions
        a, b, c (Å) 123.0, 47.2, 49.9 123.2, 47.3, 49.7 47.8, 95.8, 122.9
        α, β, γ (°) 90, 110.8, 90 90, 110.6, 90 90, 93.43, 90
    Resolution (Å) 2.1 (2.21–2.10) 2.0 (2.11–2.00) 1.7 (1.79–1.70)
    Rsym or R merge 0.073 (0.276)a 0.080 (0.295) 0.059 (0.297)
    II 8.3 (2.3) 8.8 (2.6) 6.6 (2.3)
    Completeness (%) 98.0 (97.1) 97.6 (97.6) 98.3 (95.9)
    Redundancy 3.3 (3.3) 3.5 (3.5) 3.4 (3.4)
Refinement
    Resolution (Å) 2.1 2.0 1.7
    Number of reflections 14,748 17,201 113,281
    Rwork/Rfree 0.21/0.27 0.18/0.22 0.23/0.26
    Number of atoms
        Protein 1962 1963 7790
        Ligand 13 10 20
        Ion 5 5 20
        Water 157 151 596
    B factors
        Protein 15.3 16.4 21.4
        Ligand 10.8 10.9 12.4
        Ion 28.2 24.8 35.4
        Water 19.5 21.3 25.3
    RMS deviations
        Bond lengths (Å) 0.025 0.017 0.014
        Bond angles (°) 2.234 1.552 1.438

A single dataset collected from a single crystal was used for each structure. There was one molecule in the asymmetric unit of the glutamate or quisqualate–T686A complex and four molecules in the glutamate–T686S complex. RMS, Root mean square.

aHighest resolution shell is shown in parentheses.