Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;9:11177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47581-y

Table 1.

Differential expression of EV-miRNAs in HCT116 compared to SW480 under RAPA and CsA treatment.

miR-ID HCT116 SW480 RT-PCR Validation
RAPA vs Untr CsA vs Untr RAPA vs Untr CsA vs Untr
FC P FC P FC P FC P
miR-6796-5p 6.978 0.001 −2.204 0.003 1.089 0.615 −1.483 0.125 Ø
miR-6746-5p 2.084 0.030 −2.024 0.005 1.423 0.034 −1.626 0.023
miR-6787-5p 4.166 0.035 −3.292 0.022 1.212 0.215 1.024 0.920
miR-6776-5p 4.126 0.017 −4.276 0.004 1.274 0.124 −1.038 0.757 Ø
miR-6127 4.457 0.007 −3.486 0.004 1.161 0.232 −1.381 0.056
miR-6846-5p 2.345 0.014 −2.309 0.009 1.111 0.460 −1.326 0.053 Ø

Target genes had cumulative weighted context++ scores from the top to zero.

FC = fold change.

*P < 0.01 versus Untr (untreated).

Ø Negative RT-PCR Validation.

√ Positive RT-PCR Validation.