Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;60(8):1449–1456. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P091033

TABLE 1.

Demographic data and diagnostic parameters of studied subjects

Controls (n = 39) AD (n = 37) non-AD DEM (n = 16) P
Age (years) 60 ± 16 69 ± 9a 63 ± 8 aP < 0.01 vs. controls
Males [n (%)] 20 (51) 19 (49) 8 (50) 0.960
Aβ 1-42 (ng/l) 966 (782–1,390) 472 (381–562)a 742 (555–1,414) aP < 0.0001 vs. controls and non-AD DEM
Total tau (ng/l) 120 (98–181) 607 (297–978)a,b 216 (103–549) aP < 0.0001 vs. controls
bP = 0.004 vs. non-AD DEM
Phosphorylated tau (ng/l) 30 (26–38) 84 (62–104)a 34 (16–50) aP < 0.0001 vs. controls and non-AD DEM
apoE4 carriers [n (%)] 7 (18) 26 (70)a 5 (31) aP < 0.0001 vs. controls and non-AD DEM

Normally distributed parameters are presented as means ± SDs, and skewed continuous parameters are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges). Statistically different values are reported in bold. CSF neurobiomarker (Aβ 1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau) values were available for 12/39 subjects in the control group and 13/16 subjects in the non-AD DEM group.