Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 11;27(28):7520–7531. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1555-07.2007

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Similar sensitivities of the tonic currents recorded in dentate granule cells of control and pilocarpine-treated mice to the benzodiazepine DZ. A, The two raw traces originate from a granule cell each recorded in slices obtained from a control (left) and a pilocarpine-treated (right) mouse, respectively. The horizontal bars indicate the perfusion of the drugs. Note the increase in tonic current in both the control and the pilocarpine-treated cells after perfusion of 1 μm DZ. B, Paired plots of the tonic currents before and after the perfusion of DZ in control and pilocarpine-treated (Pilo) mice. The effect of DZ was significant in both the control (p = 0.003, paired t test; from 19.7 ± 4.9 to 30.4 ± 7.0 pA in DZ; n = 7) and pilocarpine-treated mice (p = 0.02, paired t test; from 20.0 ± 5.7 to 32.7 ± 9.7 pA in DZ; n = 7). Thick lines and symbols indicate mean ± SEM. C, As shown in the box plots, the effect of DZ was to increase the tonic current by 61.2 ± 9.4% in control granule cells, which was not significantly different (p > 0.5; unpaired t test) from its effect on granule cells of pilocarpine-treated mice (59.4 ± 5.0%). The notations of the box plots are as described in Figure 2. D, The linear slope analysis of the tonic current (I tonic) values before and after DZ treatment also shows a significant effect in both control (slope, 1.51) and pilocarpine-treated mice (slope, 1.65). This graph also indicates that the effect of DZ was independent from the original magnitude of the tonic current.