Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 12;27(37):9893–9900. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2837-07.2007

Table 1.

Results from conjunction analysis and direct contrast between saccade and manual inhibition [eye (stop–go) versus hand (stop–go)]

Region BA Cluster size x y z T Z
Conjunction
    Right insula 178 30 18 3 6.03 4.59
    Right IFG 47 42 18 −6 5.50 4.32
    Left IFG 47 119 −42 12 −6 5.74 4.44
    Left insula −27 21 3 5.38 4.25
    Medial SFG 8 53 9 18 54 6.19 4.66
    Right MFG* 10/46 35 36 48 21 4.61 3.81
    Right IPL* 40 31 57 −45 45 4.02 3.44
Eye > hand
    Left IFG 44/6 17 −45 6 12 5.27 3.65
−54 3 15 4.50 3.32
    Right IFG* 45/44 16 45 18 12 3.66 2.90
44 54 15 9 3.13 2.59
Hand > eye
    Left IFG* 47 14 −24 24 −21 4.46 3.30
−27 15 −15 3.06 2.55
9 −39 21 −9 3.44 2.77
    Right IFG* 47 10 30 24 −15 3.24 2.66

For the direct contrasts, ″Eye > hand″ result was masked with the stop–go contrast for the saccade task, whereas ″Hand > eye″ result was masked with the stop–go contrast for the manual task. T values, Z values, and MNI coordinates (x, y, z in mm) of the activation peaks in the clusters are listed. Unless otherwise stated, all local maxima were significant after corrected for false discovery rate (p ≤ 0.05). Eye, Saccade inhibition; Hand, manual inhibition. *p < 0.13 (false discovery rate), approaching significance.