Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 10;27(41):11091–11102. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1808-07.2007

Table 2.

Path weights (arbitrary units) from multivariate Granger causality analyses in better (top) and poorer (bottom) performers

L aIPS L FEF L PCS L pIPS R aIPS R calcarine R FEF R medial parietal R pIPS
Better
    L aIPS 51 97 18↑ 50 29 71 20↑ 4↑
    L FEF 98 101 16↑ 48 95 69 22↓ 7↑
    L PCS 105 44 21↑ 45 82 83 25↑ 10↓
    L pIPS 67 30 86 29 36 85 38 19↓
    R aIPS 101 50 86 14↑ 60 87 6↓ 4↑
    R calcarine 32 49 101 11↑ 43 105 38 22↓
    R FEF 76 36 84 26 51 82 19↓ 4↑
    R medial parietal 55 60 76 19↑ 16↑ 97 74 7↑
    R pIPS 74 33 91 16↑ 62 94 80 25↑
Poorer
    L aIPS 10↑ 3↑ 27 9↑ 111 76 4↓ 14↓
    L FEF 72 3↓ 18↑ 12↑ 102 91 17↑ 7↑
    L PCS 135 10↑ 18↑ 7↓ 130 83 12↓ 7↑
    L pIPS 119 14↑ 5↓ 2↓ 60 64 19↑ 14↓
    R aIPS 129 21↑ 10↓ 7↑ 99 113 12↓ 16↓
    R calcarine 112 15↑ 6↑ 10↓ 5↓ 117 20↑ 2↑
    R FEF 85 17↑ 2↓ 13↑ 14↑ 125 12↑ 10↓
    R medial parietal 43 14↑ 4↓ 24↑ 6↓ 111 74 6↑
    R pIPS 116 24 10↓ 17↑ 6↓ 45 110 25

Significant weights are indicated in bold type. Arrows beside each path weight reflect covariations in the same direction (↑) or opposite direction (↓). L, Left; R, right.