Table 3.
Hypothesis tested | Outcome |
---|---|
(1) Firing rate of individual afferents (SA1, RA, PC) | Rejected because individual rate-intensity functions comprise long entrainment plateaus |
(2) Mean firing rate of individual afferents | SA1, R2 = 0.68 |
RA, R2 = 0.89 | |
PC, R2 = 0.74* | |
(3) Weighted firing rate of three afferent types located under the probe | R2 = 0.97 |
(4) Number of afferents of each type activated under the probe | Rejected because number of afferents recruited plateaus at low stimulus intensities (Fig. 4) |
(5) Estimated total firing rate of each afferent type | SA1, R2 = 0.56 |
RA, R2 = 0.80 | |
PC, R2 = 0.74* | |
(6) Estimated weighted firing rate of three afferent types | R2 = 0.96 |
(7) Estimated total number of afferents of each type activated by the stimulus | SA1, R2 = 0.10 |
RA, R2 = 0.51 | |
PC, R2 = 0.54 | |
(8) Estimated weighted number of active afferents | R2 = 0.86 |
*Codes are identical.