Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 24;27(43):11687–11699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1486-07.2007

Table 3.

Summary of neural codes

Hypothesis tested Outcome
(1) Firing rate of individual afferents (SA1, RA, PC) Rejected because individual rate-intensity functions comprise long entrainment plateaus
(2) Mean firing rate of individual afferents SA1, R2 = 0.68
RA, R2 = 0.89
PC, R2 = 0.74*
(3) Weighted firing rate of three afferent types located under the probe R2 = 0.97
(4) Number of afferents of each type activated under the probe Rejected because number of afferents recruited plateaus at low stimulus intensities (Fig. 4)
(5) Estimated total firing rate of each afferent type SA1, R2 = 0.56
RA, R2 = 0.80
PC, R2 = 0.74*
(6) Estimated weighted firing rate of three afferent types R2 = 0.96
(7) Estimated total number of afferents of each type activated by the stimulus SA1, R2 = 0.10
RA, R2 = 0.51
PC, R2 = 0.54
(8) Estimated weighted number of active afferents R2 = 0.86

*Codes are identical.