Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 17;10:473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00473

Table 3.

Assessment of the microflora in the included studies.

Author Bacteria included in our analyses Sample Unit Microbiology assessment
Parracho (35) Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus Fecal Relative abundance FISH (Cy3-labeled 16S rRNA probes)
Kang (29) Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, Parabacteroides, Ruminococcus Fecal Percentage Pyrosequencing
Finegold (36) Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Faecalibacterium, Parabacteroides, Ruminococcus Fecal Percentage Pyrosequencing
Inoue (37) Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides Fecal Percentage Pyrosequencing
Strati (30) Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides Fecal Percentage Pyrosequencing
Wang (34) Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, E. coli, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus Fecal Relative abundance QPCR (various bacterial primers)
De Angelis (23) Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Enterococcus, Faecalibacterium, Parabacteroides, Ruminococcus Fecal Percentage, relative abundance Pyrosequencing
Adams (32) Bifidobacterium, E. coli, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus Fecal Relative abundance Culture (colony-forming units)
Gondalia (33) E. coli Fecal Relative abundance Culture (colony-forming units)

FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; rRNA, ribosomal ribonucleic acid; QPCR, real-time quantitative PCR detecting system.