Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 21;26(25):6813–6822. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5320-05.2006

Table 3.

Effect of BIBP3226 in slices (one to four per animal) from chronically OA- (n = 7) or VPA- (n = 8) treated P13–P15 animals

OA VPA
ACSF BIBP3226 Washout ACSF BIBP3226 Washout
Oscillation amplitude 5246 ± 1001 6262 ± 1399 5053 ± 986 3209 ± 943 p < 0.5 4222 ± 1253 3806 ± 1117
Normalized 1 1.17 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.06 1 1.28 ± 0.05 p < 0.5 1.16 ± 0.09
τ Oscillation 2889 ± 576 3046 ± 587 2839 ± 584 1839 ± 315 p < 0.5 2157 ± 398 1986 ± 405
Normalized 1 1.05 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.03 1 1.17 ± 0.05 p < 0.05* 1.05 ± 0.05
Oscillation period (ms) 315 ± 13 319 ± 13 326 ± 14 272 ± 11 p < 0.05* 276 ± 10 280 ± 10
Nonoscillatory amplitude 1614 ± 536 1673 ± 611 1332 ± 532 1474 ± 474 p > 0.5 1736 ± 511 1363 ± 397
Normalized 1 1.00 ± 0.12 0.79 ± 0.14 1 1.22 ± 0.12 p < 0.05* 1.05 ± 0.15
τ Nonoscillatory 6846 ± 2624 4217 ± 1376 3674 ± 1442 2130 ± 403 p < 0.5 1984 ± 494 1714 ± 185
Normalized 1 0.86 ± 0.08 0.80 ± 0.11 1 0.93 ± 0.08 p > 0.5 0.82 ± 0.09

Parameters for evoked oscillations in nRt according to the equation given in Materials and Methods. To identify changes caused by VPA treatment alone, comparisons were made between raw data in control conditions (ACSF) for slices from OA- and VPA-treated animals. To assess differential effects of VPA treatment on NPY signaling, comparisons were made between normalized data during BIBP3226 superfusion (Y1 receptor blockade) in slices from OA- and VPA-treated animals. The asterisks denote statistical significance in comparisons between OA and VPA, either in baseline parameters (see column VPA/ACSF for raw data) or in degree of change upon BIBP3226 appplication (see column VPA/BIBP3226 for normalized data).