Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2006 Jun 21;26(25):6761–6770. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4924-05.2006

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2006 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/06/266761-10$15.00/0

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 6. — Comparison of the visual stimulus selectivity between rewarded and unrewarded stimuli. The magnitude of the stimulus selectivity in rewarded trials was defined by the root of mean variance of firing rates in go rewarded and no-go rewarded conditions, which can be written as . The magnitude of the stimulus selectivity in unrewarded trials was calculated similarly but from firing rates in the go unrewarded and no-go unrewarded conditions, that is . The mean firing rates in the window from 100 to 500 ms from the stimulus onset were used. The magenta dots represents PRh cells, and the cyan dots represent TE cells. The stimulus selectivity was comparable between the rewarded and unrewarded conditions in both areas.

Inline graphic — Comparison of the visual stimulus selectivity between rewarded and unrewarded stimuli. The magnitude of the stimulus selectivity in rewarded trials was defined by the root of mean variance of firing rates in go rewarded and no-go rewarded conditions, which can be written as . The magnitude of the stimulus selectivity in unrewarded trials was calculated similarly but from firing rates in the go unrewarded and no-go unrewarded conditions, that is . The mean firing rates in the window from 100 to 500 ms from the stimulus onset were used. The magenta dots represents PRh cells, and the cyan dots represent TE cells. The stimulus selectivity was comparable between the rewarded and unrewarded conditions in both areas.