Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 12;26(15):4046–4053. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-05.2006

Table 2.

Summarized results of ANOVA on the projected moments of P1m, N1m, and P2m responses

P1m N1m P2m
First stimulus response
    Difference NE > EP [LH] EP > NE [TN/LH] EP > NE
    (F(1,18); p) (5.42; <0.04) (11.0; <0.004) (5.72; <0.03)
    Source GRP×HS GRP×STM×HS GRP
    Difference CD > TN TN > CDa TN > CD [LH]
    (F(1,18); p) (50.0; <0.0001) (5.34; <0.04) (21.0; <0.0002)
    Source STM STM STM×HS
Second to fifth stimuli responses
    Difference EP ∼ NE EP ∼ NE EP > NE
    (F(1,18); p) (1.32; ns) (1.28; ns) (28.9; <0.0001)
    Source GRP GRP GRP
    Difference CD > TN TN > CD TN > CD [LH], CD > TN [RH]
    (F(1,18); p) (22.2; <0002) (46.1; <0.0001) (32.5; <0.0001)
    Source STM STM STM ×HS

Significant differences found between NE and EP groups and between chord (CD) and tone (TN) stimuli are shown with F- and p-values. When the difference was found in a condition of hemisphere and/or stimulus, that condition is indicated in square brackets. The source of statistical test is indicated by the factor(s) of group (GRP), STM, and HS investigated in ANOVA. LH, Left hemisphere; RH, right hemisphere; ns, not significant.

aIn conditions of LH/EP and RH/NE, where an interaction of GRP×STM×HS was also present.